Honoring the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe for its contributions.
Summary
H.R. 1152 is a simple honorary House resolution recognizing the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe for its long history, cultural heritage, and contributions to the El Paso region and the State of Texas. The resolution recounts the tribe’s origins, its role in building the Ysleta Mission and establishing one of the oldest governments in Texas, and its continued presence as a federally recognized Native American tribe with more than 4,000 members nationwide.
The resolution highlights the tribe’s economic and civic role, including operation of businesses and support for health care, education, law enforcement, tribal courts, elder assistance, housing, infrastructure, workforce training, and job creation. It concludes by expressing the Texas House’s esteem for the tribe and directing that an official copy of the resolution be prepared and delivered to the tribe as a formal gesture of respect.
Impact
Because H.R. 1152 is a ceremonial resolution rather than a substantive bill, it does not change state law, create new rights, or impose obligations on any person or agency. Its practical effect is symbolic: it formally acknowledges the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo’s historical significance, community contributions, and ongoing governmental and economic role in the El Paso area, while placing the recognition into the official records of the Texas House.
Sentiment
The sentiment around the resolution is strongly positive and respectful. The House adopted it by non-record vote, and the text itself is laudatory throughout, emphasizing the tribe’s resilience, self-governance, public service, and regional importance. The lack of recorded opposition or committee controversy suggests broad, uncontentious support.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in the available materials. The resolution is honorary and nonbinding, so it does not present disputes over funding, jurisdiction, regulation, or tribal-state authority. Any discussion would likely center only on the appropriateness of formal recognition, but the available vote history and committee information indicate no recorded disagreement.