Urging Congress to reimburse the State of Texas for border security costs incurred under Operation Lone Star.
Summary
HCR 40 is a House Concurrent Resolution that urges Congress to reimburse Texas for border security costs the state says it has incurred under Operation Lone Star. The resolution describes Operation Lone Star as a state response to what Texas characterizes as federal inaction on border security, citing deployments of the Texas National Guard and Department of Public Safety, use of surveillance technology, support for local law enforcement, and legal, administrative, public health, and humanitarian efforts related to migration.
The resolution does not change Texas statutes or create new state regulatory requirements. Instead, it is a formal legislative request directed to the federal government, asking Congress to repay the state for expenses tied to border enforcement and related operations. It also directs the Texas secretary of state to transmit copies of the resolution to federal leaders and Texas’s congressional delegation for entry into the Congressional Record.
Impact
HCR 40 has no direct effect on state law, criminal law, immigration law, or appropriations authority. Its practical impact is political and fiscal: it seeks federal reimbursement for state spending on border security and reinforces Texas’s position that the federal government should bear responsibility for border enforcement costs. The resolution also serves as an official statement of legislative support for Operation Lone Star and the state’s border security expenditures.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment around the resolution appears strongly supportive. The House adopted it overwhelmingly, 135-5, and the Senate committee reported it favorably by a 5-0 vote, indicating broad bipartisan or near-unanimous support for the message of the resolution. The text frames the issue as a response to a border crisis and emphasizes public safety, drug interdiction, and state financial burden.
Contention
The main point of contention is not within the resolution’s mechanics, but in its underlying premise: that Texas should be reimbursed by Congress for costs associated with Operation Lone Star and that the federal government has failed in its border-security duties. Supporters view the measure as a justified request for repayment and recognition of state expenditures, while critics would likely object to the characterization of federal failure, the scale and purpose of Operation Lone Star, or the use of state funds for border enforcement and related humanitarian activities. No committee transcript was provided, so the recorded votes are the primary indicator of support.
Declaring an invasion of the State of Texas by transnational cartel terrorists; urging the Governor to accelerate construction of a wall along the southern border; urging the U.S. Congress to deploy military forces.
Urges Congress to enact "Presidential Security Resources Reimbursement Act of 2024" to reimburse State and local units for public safety expenses incurred during major presidential and vice presidential candidates' visits.