Relating to design considerations of transportation projects by the Texas Department of Transportation.
Summary
HB 5391 would amend the Texas Transportation Code to expand the factors the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) must consider when planning highway construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or resurfacing projects, excluding routine maintenance resurfacing. In addition to existing considerations such as safety, durability, maintenance costs, environmental and aesthetic impacts, access for other transportation modes, and input from affected communities, the bill adds a requirement to consider alternative designs that have been approved by a local governing body or metropolitan planning organization, as well as the negative impacts of prior transportation projects on the affected community.
The bill also directs the Texas Transportation Commission to adopt rules requiring review of those alternative designs in a manner similar to review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). However, the bill limits this requirement to projects already subject to NEPA review and allows TxDOT to disregard an approved alternative design if the department determines it is frivolous, unreasonable, or intended to delay the project. The bill would take effect September 1, 2025.
Impact
HB 5391 would modify Section 201.615 of the Transportation Code by broadening the design-review criteria TxDOT must weigh for certain highway projects and by creating a new statutory role for locally approved alternative designs in the state transportation planning process. It would also require rulemaking by the Texas Transportation Commission to implement the new review process, potentially affecting project development timelines, local-government input, and the scope of administrative review for NEPA-covered projects.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and available context, the measure appears to be framed as a community-input and project-design oversight bill rather than a controversial funding or enforcement measure. The inclusion of local approval, environmental review-style analysis, and community impact considerations suggests support from stakeholders interested in local control, aesthetics, and mitigation of transportation harms. No committee testimony or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of organized support or opposition in the available record.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely the balance between local influence and state transportation authority. Supporters would likely favor giving municipalities, counties, and metropolitan planning organizations more weight in shaping project design and requiring TxDOT to account for prior harms to communities. Opponents may argue that the bill could slow project delivery, increase administrative burdens, or allow local bodies to advance alternative designs that are impractical; the bill anticipates this criticism by allowing TxDOT to reject alternatives it deems frivolous, unreasonable, or delay-oriented. Another possible issue is the bill’s limitation to projects subject to NEPA, which may narrow its practical reach and create questions about consistency across projects.
An Act to amend and reenact §§ 16.1-340.2 and 37.2-810, as it is currently effective and as it shall become effective, of the Code of Virginia, relating to transportation of person in the temporary detention process.
Health: licensing; behavioral health transportation licensing requirements; provide for. Amends 1974 PA 258 (MCL 330.1001 - 330.2106) by adding ch. 9B. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0927'26
Requires transportation network companies to share information concerning sexual misconduct investigation of driver; authorizes transportation network company to ban drivers from accessing digital network during and following investigation.