Texas House Bill HJR8

Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.

• Filed: 8/15/25

Summary

HJR 8 proposes a constitutional amendment to deny certain compensation to legislators who are absent without excuse when their chamber lacks a quorum. Specifically, it would bar a member of the Texas Legislature from receiving salary, per diem, or mileage reimbursement for any period of unexcused absence during a quorum break in the member’s house. The resolution does not itself change ordinary statute; instead, it would amend Article III of the Texas Constitution by adding a new subsection to Section 24. If approved by voters, the amendment would be placed on the May 2, 2026 ballot and would become part of the state constitution, creating a constitutional limitation on legislative pay in quorum-break situations.

Impact

If adopted, the measure would directly affect compensation rules for state legislators by making salary, per diem, and mileage reimbursement unavailable during unexcused absences when the relevant chamber cannot conduct business for lack of quorum. It would amend the Texas Constitution rather than a statute, meaning the rule would have higher legal force than ordinary legislation and would govern future legislative conduct and payroll administration for the Texas House or Senate in quorum-related absences.

Sentiment

The bill’s apparent purpose is punitive and deterrent, aimed at discouraging quorum-breaking absences by tying compensation to attendance. Because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, there is no documented debate in the supplied materials; however, the measure’s framing suggests support from those favoring stronger accountability for legislators and likely concern from those who view it as an attempt to pressure members during quorum disputes.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely whether withholding pay and mileage from absent members is an appropriate response to quorum-breaking tactics or an improper penalty on elected officials. Supporters would likely argue it promotes accountability and ensures legislators cannot be paid while preventing the chamber from doing business, while opponents may argue it could be used as a political tool, may not resolve quorum standoffs, and could raise fairness concerns about what counts as an unexcused absence and how compensation should be handled during legislative walkouts.