Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SJR69

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Sent toSOS
 
Proposed Const. Amend.
 

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment dedicating to the national research university fund a portion of certain income from the lease for oil and gas exploration of land dedicated to the permanent university fund.

Impact

If passed, SJR69 will amend sections of the Texas Constitution relating to the management of the PUF, ensuring that a specified portion of profits from oil and gas leases is earmarked for the NRUF. This could potentially result in significant funding for universities designated under the NRUF, allowing them to expand research projects and enhance programs that attract federal and private funding. The amendments proposed would become effective on January 1, 2024, ensuring a smooth transition into the new funding structure following voter approval, which is slated for November 7, 2023.

Summary

SJR69 proposes a constitutional amendment to dedicate a portion of the income derived from oil and gas leases on land associated with the Permanent University Fund (PUF) to the National Research University Fund (NRUF). This initiative aims to bolster state funding for research universities, thus enhancing academic resources and opportunities within Texas. By specifically allowing the allocation of income from these leases, the bill envisions a more robust financial framework for educational institutions that support the state's economic growth through research and innovation.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SJR69 appears to be largely positive, particularly among those who advocate for increased funding for higher education and research. Supporters argue that dedicating these funds will not only strengthen Texas's higher education landscape but also provide long-term economic benefits by encouraging innovation and attracting talent. However, there are concerns regarding the dependency on fluctuating oil and gas revenues, with critics questioning the sustainability of such funding in an increasingly environmentally conscious age.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate over the reliance on oil and gas revenues, which some view as an unstable source of funding in light of market volatility and changing energy policies. Opponents may raise concerns about diverting funds that could otherwise contribute to other essential state services. Additionally, the effectiveness of the NRUF in achieving its intended goals has been scrutinized, with discussions on ensuring accountability for how these funds are utilized at the university level.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX SB1157

Relating to the flaring and venting of methane gas on land dedicated to the permanent university fund.

TX SJR80

Proposing a constitutional amendment dedicating some of the interest in the permanent school fund to universal pre-kindergarten and the school safety allotment.

TX SJR66

Proposing a constitutional amendment dedicating a portion of the revenue derived from state sales and use taxes and insurance premium taxes to the Texas water fund.

TX HB1190

Relating to the reduction of methane gas flaring on land dedicated to the permanent university fund.

TX HJR33

Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the property tax reduction fund and dedicating certain surplus state revenue to the fund.

TX HJR169

Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation of funds to support the capital needs of educational programs offered by certain component institutions of the Texas State University System.

TX HB5

Eliminates certain statutory dedications and eliminates certain dedications of certain funds (Item #3)

TX HJR5

Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation of funds to support the capital needs of educational programs offered by the Texas State Technical College System and removing that system and its campuses from the annual appropriation of certain constitutionally dedicated funding for public institutions of higher education.

TX HJR126

Proposing a constitutional amendment dedicating certain general revenue that would otherwise be transferred to the economic stabilization fund to the Texas water fund.

TX HJR85

Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation of funds to support the capital needs of educational programs offered by the Texas State Technical College System and certain component institutions of the Texas State University System and repealing the limitation on the allocation to the Texas State Technical College System and its campuses of the annual appropriation of certain constitutionally dedicated funding for public institutions of higher education.

Similar Bills

LA HB472

(Constitutional Amendment) Revises Article VII of the Constitution of La. (OR -$139,000,000 GF RV See Note)

NJ ACR123

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR75

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

LA HB244

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB678

(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB473

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.