A RESOLUTION to honor Bob Kesling on the occasion of his retirement.
Summary
Senate Joint Resolution 155 is a commemorative resolution honoring Bob Kesling upon his retirement after more than 25 years as the Voice of the Vols on the Vol Radio Network. The resolution recounts his long career with the University of Tennessee and Tennessee athletics, including his early work with John Ward, his years as a spotter and broadcaster, his tenure as the play-by-play voice for Lady Vol basketball and Tennessee football and basketball, and his service in other broadcasting roles across radio and television. It also highlights his awards, hall of fame inductions, and community involvement.
The resolution does not change substantive law or create new legal obligations. Its effect is ceremonial: it formally recognizes Kesling’s career and directs that an appropriate copy be prepared for presentation. As a joint resolution, it functions as an expression of the General Assembly’s appreciation rather than as a statute affecting state agencies, private parties, or the Tennessee Code.
Impact
SJR0155 has no regulatory or fiscal impact on state law and does not amend any statutes. It is a legislative commendation that records the General Assembly’s recognition of Bob Kesling’s broadcasting career and retirement, with the only operative language being the preparation of an official presentation copy of the resolution.
Sentiment
The sentiment around the resolution is overwhelmingly positive and appreciative. The votes were unanimous in both chambers, with the Senate adopting it 32-0 and the House passing it on consent calendar third consideration 91-0, indicating broad bipartisan support and no recorded opposition. The tone of the bill itself is celebratory, emphasizing Kesling’s professionalism, longevity, and service to Tennessee sports and the community.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention associated with this resolution. Because it is a honorary measure rather than a substantive bill, the available record shows no committee debate and no dissenting votes. Any discussion would likely have centered on Kesling’s career achievements and public service, not on competing legal or political positions.