AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 57, relative to alcoholic beverages.
Summary
SB1347 makes a narrow change to Tennessee’s alcoholic beverage laws by amending Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 57-9-101(c). The bill reduces the number of required “credible witnesses” from at least two to at least one in the specified statutory process. The text does not add new regulatory programs or change the broader structure of alcohol law; it simply lowers an evidentiary or procedural threshold in one provision of Title 57.
Because the bill is limited to a single statutory phrase, its practical effect is to make compliance with the affected alcohol-related procedure easier and less burdensome. Any person, business, or local official subject to Section 57-9-101(c) would need only one credible witness instead of two, which could streamline filings, approvals, or other administrative steps governed by that section.
Impact
The bill amends one provision in Tennessee Code Annotated Title 57 by changing the witness requirement from two credible witnesses to one. This directly alters the legal standard in Section 57-9-101(c) and may reduce procedural barriers for applicants or parties relying on that section. No other statutes are changed, and the bill does not appear to create new enforcement authority, penalties, or licensing categories.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of legislative debate or opposition in the available record. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears technical and narrowly tailored, which often suggests a relatively low-conflict proposal. The available context does not show any expressed support or concern from legislators or stakeholders.
Contention
The only apparent point of contention would be whether reducing the requirement from two credible witnesses to one weakens the reliability of the underlying process or, conversely, whether the current two-witness standard is unnecessarily burdensome. Because no discussion transcripts or votes are included, it is not possible to identify specific opponents, supporters, or arguments beyond that general policy tradeoff.