AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4 and Title 49, relative to education.
Summary
SB1025 is a very short education bill that repeals Tennessee Code Annotated Section 49-9-1410. The bill does not add new language or create a new program; instead, it simply deletes an existing statutory section in Title 49, which governs education. The caption also references Title 4, but the operative text only amends Title 49 by removing that section.
Because the bill is a repeal-only measure, its practical effect depends on what Section 49-9-1410 currently covers. Based on the text provided, the bill would eliminate that provision from state law and leave any related policy area to be governed by other statutes or administrative rules, if any remain. The act would take effect immediately upon becoming law, citing the public welfare.
The available record shows no committee transcripts, no recorded votes, and no stated amendments or debate, so there is no documented legislative discussion to indicate broad support or opposition. The overall sentiment appears neutral and procedural, reflecting a straightforward statutory cleanup or policy repeal rather than a contested policy expansion.
There are no explicit points of contention in the provided materials. Any disagreement would likely depend on the substance of the repealed section itself, but that underlying issue is not included in the text or voting history here. As a result, the bill appears to be a narrow, technical change with limited visible controversy in the available record.
Impact
SB1025 would remove Tennessee Code Annotated Section 49-9-1410 from the education code, thereby changing state law by eliminating that specific statutory provision. The bill does not create a replacement section or new regulatory framework, so any affected institutions, agencies, or individuals would no longer be governed by the repealed language and would instead fall under any remaining applicable education statutes or rules.
Sentiment
The available record suggests a neutral, noncontroversial posture toward the bill. There are no committee transcripts, no recorded votes, and no visible debate, so the bill appears to have been treated as a straightforward statutory repeal rather than a major policy dispute.
Contention
No specific contention is documented in the materials provided. The only potential source of disagreement would be the policy consequences of deleting Section 49-9-1410, but the text does not identify what that section covered, and there is no committee or floor discussion showing who supported or opposed the repeal.