AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39; Title 40; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.
Summary
SB0291 makes a narrow change to Tennessee law governing healthcare providers by extending a statutory deadline from 30 business days to 60 business days. Specifically, it amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 63-1-130(c), which appears to require a healthcare-related response or action within a set time period, though the bill text itself does not further describe the underlying process. The bill does not create a new program or regulatory scheme; it simply gives affected parties twice as long to comply with the existing deadline.
The bill’s practical effect is to slow the timing requirement for the covered healthcare-provider process, likely reducing pressure on providers or the agency responsible for meeting the deadline. It amends Title 63, which governs professions and health, and may indirectly affect administrative procedures tied to licensing, credentialing, or other provider-related filings. The act is set to take effect on July 1, 2025.
Impact
SB0291 changes Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 63-1-130(c), by replacing a 30-business-day deadline with a 60-business-day deadline. This affects the timing of whatever healthcare-provider action or response is governed by that subsection, extending compliance time for the regulated party or responsible agency. The bill amends Title 63 and does not otherwise alter substantive healthcare law, criminal law, or tax provisions despite the broader caption referencing Titles 39, 40, 63, and 68.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, support, or opposition in the available materials. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears administrative and limited in scope, which often suggests a relatively low-conflict proposal. The absence of voting history or discussion prevents a more specific assessment of legislative sentiment.
Contention
The only apparent point of contention is the policy choice to double the deadline from 30 to 60 business days. Supporters would likely view the longer timeframe as giving healthcare providers or administrators more realistic time to complete required actions, while any opponents might argue that extending the deadline could delay processing or reduce accountability. Because no transcripts or votes are included, no named legislators or stakeholder groups can be identified as taking either side.