Tennessee House Bill HB2330

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/2/26

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8, Chapter 3; Title 47, Chapter 25 and Title 47, Chapter 18, relative to personal rights protections.

Summary

HB2330 amends Tennessee’s personal rights protection law by extending a statutory time period from 10 years to 100 years in Tennessee Code Annotated § 47-25-1104. The bill makes this change in both subsection (a) and subdivision (b)(2)(A), but the text provided does not include the underlying substantive provisions of that section, so the practical effect must be understood in the context of the existing statute rather than the bill text alone. The act is scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2026. Based on the caption and the cited code section, the bill appears to strengthen or prolong protections related to personal rights, likely by lengthening the duration of a legal restriction, obligation, or enforcement period tied to that statute. It amends provisions in Title 47, which generally covers commercial law, and references Title 8 and Title 18 in the caption, suggesting the broader statutory framework may involve civil remedies or rights-related protections. The bill does not create a new program or regulatory scheme in the text provided; it makes a targeted amendment to an existing statute.

Impact

HB2330 changes Tennessee Code Annotated § 47-25-1104 by replacing a 10-year period with a 100-year period, thereby substantially extending the duration of the affected legal protection or restriction. Because the bill text is limited to this substitution, its impact is narrow but potentially significant for parties governed by that section, including individuals, businesses, or other entities subject to the statute’s personal rights protections. The amendment takes effect July 1, 2026, and will alter how long the statute’s specified rule applies under Tennessee law.

Sentiment

There is no committee transcript or recorded vote history provided, so the available context does not show direct debate, support, or opposition. From the bill’s title and the absence of amendments or controversy in the record provided, the measure appears to be a technical or targeted statutory change rather than a broadly contested policy proposal. No formal sentiment can be inferred beyond the fact that the bill was introduced as a straightforward amendment.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the materials provided, and there are no committee remarks or votes to indicate disagreement. The only potentially notable issue is the magnitude of the change—from 10 years to 100 years—which could materially affect the duration of rights-related protections or liabilities under the referenced statute. Any contention would likely center on whether such a long extension is necessary or appropriate, but that is not reflected in the supplied record.