AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, relative to education.
Summary
HB2257 is a narrow education bill that amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, Section 49-1-227(a). The bill changes one sentence in the existing statute so that the Department of Education must update a required list by July 1 each year. In practical terms, it standardizes the timing for the annual update and removes the prior language in that sentence, while leaving the rest of the statute intact.
Because the bill is limited to a single procedural change, it does not create a new program or substantially alter education policy. Instead, it clarifies an administrative deadline for the department’s annual update process, which may affect how the Department of Education maintains and publishes the relevant list and how schools, districts, or other stakeholders rely on that information.
Impact
The bill amends Tennessee education law by revising a specific subsection in Title 49 to require the Department of Education to update the referenced list by July 1 each year. This changes the timing requirement in state statute and makes the update deadline explicit. The practical impact is administrative rather than substantive, affecting the department’s compliance obligations and any parties that depend on the list for planning or eligibility purposes.
Sentiment
The available voting history suggests broad support for the bill. It received unanimous favorable recommendations in both the House Education Administration Subcommittee and the House Education Committee, with no recorded opposition in either vote. There are no committee transcripts indicating controversy, and the bill appears to have been treated as a routine technical or clarifying measure.
Contention
There is little evidence of substantive contention around HB2257. The main issue appears to be whether the statutory language should be revised to specify a firm annual deadline for the Department of Education’s update. The committee votes were unanimous, and no opposing arguments or stakeholder concerns are reflected in the available record, suggesting the bill was viewed as a straightforward administrative cleanup.