AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8, relative to health insurance.
Summary
HB2055 makes a narrow change to Tennessee law governing health insurance-related procedures in Title 8. Specifically, it amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 8-27-303(g), by extending a deadline from 30 days to 40 days. The bill does not create a new program or benefit; instead, it adjusts an existing statutory time period, likely giving affected parties an additional 10 days to complete a required action under the referenced section.
Because the bill only changes one deadline in an existing statute, its legal impact is limited and targeted. It would alter the timing requirements for the parties governed by Section 8-27-303(g), which may include insurers, employers, administrators, or other entities subject to Tennessee’s health insurance rules in Title 8. The bill takes effect immediately upon becoming law, indicating the legislature viewed the timing change as needing prompt implementation.
Impact
HB2055 amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8, Section 8-27-303(g), by replacing a 30-day deadline with a 40-day deadline. This changes the time allowed for compliance with the underlying statutory requirement, but it does not otherwise revise the substance of the law. The practical effect is to give affected regulated parties a longer window to act under the health insurance-related provision.
Sentiment
The available voting history suggests the bill was generally received favorably, though not unanimously. It advanced through multiple House committees with solid majority support, including a 17-5 vote in the House State & Local Government Committee and an 8-2 vote in the House Government Operations Committee. The pattern indicates broad acceptance of the technical deadline extension, with some members remaining unconvinced or cautious.
Contention
The main point of contention appears to be whether extending the deadline from 30 to 40 days is necessary or appropriate. Because the bill is narrowly focused and technical, objections likely centered on the policy choice to lengthen compliance time rather than on the bill’s overall purpose. The recorded committee votes show some opposition at each stage, but no transcript is available to identify specific arguments or sponsors’ responses.