AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 42, relative to airports.
Summary
HB1389 makes a narrow change to Tennessee law governing airports by extending a statutory deadline from 30 days to 30 business days. The bill amends Tennessee Code Annotated Section 42-5-204(a), which is part of Title 42, the chapter dealing with airports, and changes the time period for an action required under that section without altering the underlying airport policy or regulatory framework.
In practical terms, the bill gives affected parties more time to comply with or respond to the airport-related requirement referenced in the statute. By converting the deadline from calendar days to business days, the measure lengthens the effective compliance window and may reduce pressure on airport operators, local governments, or other regulated entities that must meet the deadline.
The available record shows no committee transcript, vote history, or recorded amendments, so there is no documented debate or formal opposition in the materials provided. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears technical and administrative rather than controversial, with a likely focus on clarifying or easing timing requirements.
Because no discussion or voting data is available, the general sentiment cannot be measured directly from the legislative record provided. However, the bill’s limited scope and procedural nature suggest it was likely viewed as a routine housekeeping change rather than a substantive policy shift. Any contention would most likely concern whether the longer business-day deadline is necessary or whether it delays compliance, but no specific objections are documented here.
Impact
HB1389 amends Tennessee Code Annotated Section 42-5-204(a) in Title 42, changing a deadline from 30 days to 30 business days for an airport-related statutory requirement. This affects the timing obligations of the parties covered by that section—potentially airport operators, airport authorities, or related governmental entities—by extending the period allowed to act. The bill does not create a new program or alter airport regulation broadly; it only modifies one deadline in existing law.
Sentiment
No committee discussion or vote record is provided, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition from the legislative process. The bill appears to be a technical, noncontroversial adjustment to an airport statute, suggesting a generally neutral or favorable reception. The absence of recorded debate indicates there was likely little visible contention in the available materials.
Contention
There are no documented points of contention in the provided transcripts or voting history. If any concern existed, it would likely center on the practical effect of extending the deadline from calendar days to business days—either as a helpful administrative accommodation or as a delay in required compliance—but the record supplied does not identify any lawmakers, agencies, or stakeholders taking a formal opposing position.