AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 47; Title 48 and Title 66, relative to property.
Summary
HB1265 makes a narrow change to Tennessee’s property law by amending Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 66-29-165(a). The bill reduces a statutory period from four years to three years by deleting the word “four (4)” and replacing it with “three (3).” Based on the caption and the cited code section, the measure appears to affect a property-related process governed under Title 66, though the bill text itself does not further describe the underlying procedure.
The bill is short and technical, with no additional substantive provisions, definitions, or implementation details. It would take effect immediately upon becoming law, reflecting the legislature’s intent for prompt application. Because the bill amends only one numerical timeframe in the code, its practical effect is limited to the specific property-related statute referenced in Section 66-29-165(a).
Impact
HB1265 would directly amend Tennessee’s property statutes by shortening a statutory period from four years to three years in Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 66-29-165(a). This change would alter the timing requirements for the affected property-related legal process, potentially accelerating when rights, claims, or procedures under that section may be exercised or resolved. The bill does not amend any other provisions and does not create new programs or regulatory structures.
Sentiment
There is no recorded committee discussion or vote history in the provided materials, so the bill’s broader sentiment cannot be measured from debate or roll-call data. Based on the text alone, HB1265 appears to be a routine, technical property-law adjustment rather than a controversial policy proposal. The absence of transcripts or votes suggests no documented public disagreement in the supplied record.
Contention
No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. The only substantive issue is the reduction of the statutory period from four years to three years, which could matter to parties affected by the underlying property statute. Any disagreement would likely center on whether shortening that timeframe is appropriate or whether it could disadvantage owners, claimants, or other stakeholders subject to the referenced code section.