Tennessee House Bill HB1028

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/5/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 56 and Title 63, relative to physician assistants.

Summary

HB1028 is a narrow technical bill affecting the regulation of physician assistants in Tennessee. The bill amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63, by deleting one specific subdivision in Section 63-19-103(b)(2). Based on the text provided, the measure does not add new licensing categories, duties, or enforcement provisions; it simply removes an existing statutory provision from the physician assistant chapter. Because the bill text is limited to the deletion of a single subdivision, its practical effect is to change the governing law for physician assistants in whatever manner that removed provision previously addressed. The bill also references Title 56 in its caption, but the operative language only amends Title 63. The act takes effect immediately upon becoming law, indicating the legislature intended prompt implementation.

Impact

The bill would directly amend Tennessee’s physician assistant statutes by striking one subdivision from T.C.A. § 63-19-103(b)(2). That means the affected statutory language would no longer be part of the law governing physician assistants, potentially altering qualifications, scope, or administrative requirements depending on what the deleted subdivision covered. No other professions, agencies, or benefit programs are expressly changed in the bill text.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or vote records were provided, so there is no documented debate or recorded support/opposition to assess. On its face, HB1028 appears to be a routine, noncontroversial cleanup or policy adjustment bill focused on a professional licensing statute. The immediate effective date suggests the sponsor and legislature viewed it as a matter requiring prompt enactment.

Contention

There are no recorded committee discussions or votes in the materials provided, so no specific points of contention can be identified from the legislative history. Any disagreement, if it existed, would likely have centered on the policy consequences of deleting the referenced physician assistant provision—such as effects on licensure, supervision, or practice authority—but the available record does not show who, if anyone, raised those concerns.