AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healing arts.
Summary
HB0866 makes a narrow change to Tennessee’s healing arts laws by amending Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 63-2-101(a)(1). The bill increases the number of days referenced in that provision from 10 to 20. Based on the caption and the cited code section, the measure appears to adjust a timing or notice-related requirement within the state’s regulation of healing arts, rather than creating a new program or licensing scheme.
The bill takes effect immediately upon becoming law, with the stated justification that the public welfare requires it. Because the text is limited to a single statutory substitution, its legal effect is confined to the specific deadline or period addressed in the amended section. It would affect the parties governed by Title 63 and related healing arts provisions, likely including practitioners, applicants, or entities subject to the procedural requirement in that section.
Impact
HB0866 would amend Tennessee law by changing a statutory time period in Title 63 from 10 days to 20 days. The bill does not add new regulatory authority or repeal existing provisions; instead, it lengthens an existing deadline or waiting period in the healing arts code. Its practical impact would be on the regulated parties and administrators who must comply with the affected section, potentially giving more time for notice, response, or processing under the statute.
Sentiment
There is no recorded committee transcript or vote history in the provided materials, so there is no direct evidence of debate or opposition. The bill’s text is brief and technical, suggesting a generally procedural or administrative adjustment rather than a controversial policy change. On that basis, the available record indicates a neutral to likely uncontentious posture, though no formal sentiment can be confirmed from the supplied context.
Contention
No specific points of contention are documented in the provided committee transcripts or voting history. The only identifiable substantive change is the extension of a statutory period from 10 to 20 days, which could matter to practitioners or regulators if the deadline affects compliance, notice, or enforcement timing. However, without discussion records, it is not possible to attribute any objections or support to particular stakeholders.