Tennessee House Bill HB0757

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Refer: 2/26/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 13; Title 20; Title 21; Title 25; Title 26; Title 28; Title 29; Title 40; Title 62; Title 66; and Title 68, relative to rental property.

Summary

HB0757 makes a narrow change to Tennessee landlord-tenant law by extending a statutory deadline from 30 days to 45 days in Tennessee Code Annotated § 66-7-112(b)(1)(B). Based on the bill caption and the cited code section, the measure concerns rental property and likely affects a notice or response period tied to residential leasing or landlord obligations. The bill applies prospectively to agreements entered into, amended, or renewed on or after its effective date. In practical terms, the bill gives the affected party an additional 15 days to act before a statutory consequence attaches. Because the bill amends only one subsection of the Tennessee Code, it does not appear to create a new program or regulatory scheme; instead, it adjusts an existing deadline within the state’s rental-property framework.

Impact

The bill amends Tennessee Code Annotated § 66-7-112(b)(1)(B) by replacing a 30-day period with a 45-day period. This changes the timing requirements for the affected rental-property provision and will apply only to lease agreements entered into, amended, or renewed on or after the act’s effective date. The practical effect is to lengthen a statutory deadline in landlord-tenant law, which may alter compliance timing for landlords, tenants, or other parties governed by that section.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, support, or opposition in the available materials. The bill’s text suggests a limited, technical adjustment rather than a controversial policy change, which often indicates a neutral or low-conflict legislative posture. However, without discussion or vote history, the overall sentiment cannot be determined with certainty.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided record. If any disagreement existed, it would most likely concern the practical effect of extending the deadline from 30 to 45 days—such as whether the longer period benefits tenants by giving more time to comply or benefits landlords by clarifying timing and reducing disputes. The available materials do not identify any legislators, stakeholders, or interest groups taking opposing positions.