Tennessee House Bill HB0488

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 15, relative to certain criminal offenses.

Summary

HB0488 makes a narrow change to Tennessee criminal law by shortening a statutory time period in Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 39-15-506(a)(1), from 90 calendar days to 60 calendar days. The bill does not create a new offense or repeal an existing one; instead, it amends the timing requirement tied to an existing criminal provision in Title 39, Chapter 15. Because the bill text is limited to a single substitution, its practical effect is to accelerate whatever legal process, deadline, or enforcement window is governed by that section. The bill takes effect immediately upon becoming law, reflecting a legislative determination that the change should apply without delay.

Impact

The bill amends one provision in Tennessee’s criminal code by reducing a statutory deadline from 90 days to 60 days in Section 39-15-506(a)(1). This changes the timeline for the affected offense or procedure under Title 39, Chapter 15, and may require prosecutors, courts, law enforcement, or regulated parties to act within a shorter period. No other statutes are directly amended by the text provided.

Sentiment

There is no committee transcript or recorded vote history provided, so the available context does not show debate, opposition, or support levels. Based on the bill text alone, HB0488 appears to be a technical, narrowly targeted amendment rather than a broad policy change, which often suggests limited controversy. However, no formal sentiment can be inferred beyond the absence of recorded discussion in the materials provided.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials because there are no committee transcripts or votes. The only identifiable issue is the reduction of the applicable deadline from 90 days to 60 days, which could matter to parties affected by the underlying criminal provision if they rely on the longer timeframe. Any disagreement would likely center on whether the shorter deadline is sufficient or whether it creates practical burdens for enforcement or compliance.