Tennessee Senate Bill SB2584

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Engrossed: 3/4/24
• Enrolled: 3/20/24
• Passed: 4/4/24
• Chaptered: 4/8/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 62-18-109, relative to land surveyors.

Impact

If enacted, SB 2584 will significantly alter the current state laws regarding the registration of land surveyors. It sets forth new guidelines for obtaining certification as a professional land surveyor in training (PLSIT) and for full licensure, specifying necessary educational credentials and experiential requirements. The amendments are designed to clarify and enhance the expectations for educational and practical experience, which could improve the overall quality and proficiency within the profession.

Summary

Senate Bill 2584 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 62-18-109, which governs the qualifications and certification process for land surveyors in the state. The bill proposes revisions to the criteria by which the board assesses an applicant's qualifications, including educational background, relevant experience, and personal attributes such as character and reputation. The intended outcome is to streamline the certification process for aspiring land surveyors and ensure that applicants meet a consistent standard of professionalism and competence.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding SB 2584 appears to be supportive among stakeholders who advocate for improved standards within the land surveying profession. Proponents argue that clearer guidelines will bolster the integrity and recognition of the surveying profession in Tennessee. However, the bill may face scrutiny from those who view the changes as increasing barriers to entry for aspiring land surveyors, particularly those from diverse educational backgrounds who may find it more challenging to meet the revised standards.

Contention

A point of contention lies in the balance between maintaining high standards for land surveyors while simultaneously ensuring accessibility for individuals seeking entry into the profession. Critics might argue that stringent requirements can disproportionately affect less traditional pathways into surveying, potentially leading to a homogeneous profession that lacks the diverse perspectives needed in land development. The debate likely centers around how the new standards will affect recruitment and retention in the field of land surveying.