Tennessee Senate Bill SB2234

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 6; Title 4, Chapter 15; Title 4, Chapter 18; Title 4, Chapter 21; Title 4, Chapter 3, Part 15; Title 4, Chapter 49; Title 4, Chapter 5; Title 4, Chapter 56; Title 8, Chapter 6; Title 9; Title 12, Chapter 1, Part 2; Title 17, Chapter 3, Part 1; Title 20, Chapter 13; Title 23; Title 29; Title 31, Chapter 6; Title 35, Chapter 9; Title 37, Chapter 5; Title 39, Chapter 2, Part 2; Title 40; Title 41; Title 47, Chapter 16; Title 47, Chapter 18; Title 48; Title 49; Title 53, Chapter 11; Title 54; Title 56; Title 58; Title 66, Chapter 2; Title 67; Title 68, Chapter 221; Title 68, Chapter 33; Title 68, Chapter 211; Title 68, Chapter 213 and Title 71, relative to the attorney general and reporter.

Impact

The amendment has the potential to streamline the existing procedures, reducing the reliance on traditional paper submissions. By enabling electronic submission, proponents argue that it will save time and resources for both the reporting entities and the Attorney General's office. Furthermore, this change aligns with broader trends towards digital transformation within government operations, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

Summary

Senate Bill 2234 is designed to amend several provisions of the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically focusing on how reports are submitted to the Attorney General and reporter. One key aspect of the bill is the introduction of a provision allowing the submission of reports electronically. This legislative change aims to modernize the reporting process, making it more efficient and accessible for those required to submit such reports.

Contention

While the bill primarily focuses on improving the reporting process, there may be discussions around the security and integrity of electronic submissions. Some stakeholders might raise concerns about the potential for cyber threats or data breaches associated with shifting to an electronic format. However, specific points of contention were not detailed in the available documents, indicating that the discussion around SB2234 may be largely supportive due to its administrative nature.