Tennessee Senate Bill SB1153

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Chaptered: 5/17/23
• Passed: 5/17/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 40, Chapter 11, Part 4, relative to the education of professional bondsmen.

Impact

The introduction of SB1153 is intended to enhance the professionalism and educational standards of the bondsmen in Tennessee. By ensuring that bondsmen receive ongoing training, the bill aims to promote better practices within the profession, thereby providing greater protections for the public. It also necessitates that applicants for continuing education undergo a criminal history background check, aiming to ensure that only eligible individuals can participate in furthering their education in this field.

Summary

SB1153 is a bill aimed at amending the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 40, Chapter 11, Part 4, pertaining to the educational requirements for professional bondsmen. This bill mandates that the Tennessee Association of Professional Bail Agents must provide or contract for at least eight hours of in-person continuing education each year. It allows for the introduction of virtual classes and establishes a fee structure for this education, capping it at $450 annually for the continuing education classes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1153 appears to be supportive among members of the legislative committee who view it as a step toward better regulating the bondsmen profession. Advocates argue that such educational requirements help maintain standards and accountability within the industry. However, there may also be concerns from some within the bondsmen community regarding the financial burden imposed by the education fees and the implications of the criminal background checks.

Contention

One notable point of contention in the discussions around SB1153 is the provision that disqualifies applicants from attending continuing education classes if they have certain criminal convictions. Critics argue that this could unduly restrict eligible bondsmen based on past mistakes, while supporters contend that it is essential for maintaining the integrity of the profession. The requirements for criminal background checks might raise questions about privacy and fairness, sparking debates on how these regulations impact individuals seeking to work as professional bondsmen.