Tennessee Senate Bill SB0420

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/23
• Engrossed: 3/21/23
• Enrolled: 4/18/23
• Passed: 4/28/23
• Chaptered: 5/3/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 1, Part 3, relative to state symbols.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would lead to an official redesign of the state's great seal, a significant and symbolic alteration meant to reflect the religious underpinning as articulated in the proposed design. Supporters believe that this effort would enhance the cultural and historical significance of the state's symbols, aligning them with a particular moral and ethical perspective linked to faith. This change could also have implications for state pride and representation, resonating with constituents who favor the presence of religious language in governmental matters.

Summary

Senate Bill 420 proposes an amendment to the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting Title 4, Chapter 1, Part 3, which deals with state symbols. The bill requests the governor to submit a new design for the great seal of the state of Tennessee by July 1, 2025, incorporating the language 'In God We Trust'. This legislation aims to establish a more formalized representation of the state’s values within its official symbols, promoting a connection to faith as part of the state's identity.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 420 appears to be supportive from certain factions within the legislature, particularly among those who advocate for the inclusion of religious elements in public symbols. However, there may be opposition based on the concerns of separation of church and state, as well as potential implications for inclusivity in representing a diverse populace. While supporters view this as a restoration of values, critics might see it as a step back from the secular governance ideals.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the necessity and appropriateness of including religious language in state symbols, which some may view as exclusionary or inappropriate in a diverse society. Additionally, the request for the governor to take action by a specific deadline may also raise concerns about the politicization of state identity. The overall discourse surrounding SB 420 could indicate a larger tension between traditional views and contemporary societal values regarding faith and governance.