Tennessee House Bill HB2197

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/24
• Refer: 1/31/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 3; Section 10-7-504 and Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, relative to the creation of the "Tennessee Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearms Act."

Impact

If enacted, HB 2197 will amend the existing Tennessee Code to include a structured process for individuals seeking to waive their firearm rights temporarily. The bill mandates that once a voluntary waiver form is submitted, it must be transmitted to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI) for entry into the instant criminal background check system within 24 hours. The provision that allows for the destruction of records related to the waiver after revocation underscores the law's intent to maintain the privacy of individuals who utilize this option.

Summary

House Bill 2197, also known as the Tennessee Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearms Act, introduces a mechanism for individuals to voluntarily waive their rights to purchase or possess firearms. This bill allows residents to submit a waiver form to a circuit court or a healthcare provider, which, once processed, would prohibit them from receiving firearms for a specified period. This act aims to provide a resource for individuals who may be experiencing mental health issues or other life circumstances that lead them to seek temporary relief from their firearm rights.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 2197 appears to be supportive among those advocating for mental health awareness and responsible gun ownership. Advocates describe the bill as a proactive and preventive measure aimed at reducing gun violence and ensuring that individuals in crisis have the option to safely forgo firearm possession. Conversely, some opponents express concerns about possible misuse and the implications of government monitoring over personal rights, fearing it may infringe upon the constitutional right to bear arms.

Contention

Debate around HB 2197 includes notable contention regarding the implications of such a waiver on individual rights and responsibilities. Critics argue that the process may unintentionally label individuals seeking help as disqualified from firearm possession, potentially leading to stigmatization. Additionally, the potential for unintended bureaucracy and delays in revoking the waiver raises concerns about accessibility for individuals looking to reclaim their rights after a period of hardship.