Tennessee House Bill HB1649

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/6/24
• Engrossed: 2/22/24
• Enrolled: 3/5/24
• Passed: 3/15/24
• Chaptered: 3/26/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2, Chapter 3, Part 1, relative to elections.

Impact

This amendment impacts state election protocol by clarifying the terminology used in legislative texts pertaining to elections. By including presidential primaries in the definition, it can potentially enhance the governance of electoral processes in Tennessee. The changes aim to improve the legislative framework that governs elections, providing a better understanding for officials and the public alike regarding the schedule and types of elections, which may also facilitate administration efforts during such electoral events.

Summary

House Bill 1649 proposes amendments to the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding election laws, specifically modifying the terminology related to election types in Section 2-3-107(b)(1). The bill replaces references to 'regular November election' with 'presidential primary election or regular November election', thereby including presidential primaries in the election framework. This change aligns Tennessee’s electoral language with current practices and ensures clarity in the management of elections, particularly in designating the types of elections that occur in the state.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1649 appears to be positive, with support from various legislative members who articulate the necessity of clear and precise election laws. The adoption of the bill in a unanimous vote indicates a strong bipartisan agreement on the need for these amendments. The proactive approach to improving election laws resonates well with legislators and constituents who view it as a step towards more organized electoral processes.

Contention

Notably, there is minimal contention surrounding HB 1649. The bill was substituted for Senate Bill No. 1836 and seems to have garnered support across party lines, likely due to its straightforward nature. As election laws are often contentious topics, the lack of opposition suggests that the proposed amendments are viewed as non-controversial and necessary for the integrity of electoral processes in Tennessee.