Tennessee House Bill HB0383

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, relative to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act.

Impact

The amendment proposed in HB 0383 impacts the legal framework governing how emergency rules are handled in Tennessee. By mandating that agencies disclose proposed rules to the public, the bill seeks to promote greater accountability and public involvement in the administrative process. This provision could potentially lead to more informed citizen engagement regarding the rules that govern various aspects of public life and business operations in the state.

Summary

House Bill 0383 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically addressing aspects of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act. The significant change proposed by this bill is the requirement for agencies to provide a copy of any proposed emergency rule upon request by any person before the rule becomes effective. This adjustment is designed to enhance transparency and ensure that the public is informed about forthcoming regulations that may affect them.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 0383 appears to be positive, particularly among those advocating for transparency in government operations. Supporters likely see this bill as a step towards enhancing public trust in regulatory processes, believing that providing access to proposed emergency rules can lead to better-informed stakeholders who can contribute to the discussion about these regulations. However, some may express concerns about the practical implications of such requirements on agency efficiency and responsiveness.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HB 0383 likely revolve around the balance between public transparency and agency efficiency. While proponents argue for the necessity of public access to proposed rules, opponents might raise concerns about potential bureaucratic delays or the impact of excessive transparency on the ability of agencies to respond swiftly in emergency situations. This debate underscores the ongoing tension between the need for government accountability and the practical realities of emergency regulatory responses.