Tennessee House Bill HB0379

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 3/8/23
• Refer: 3/21/23
• Refer: 3/28/23
• Engrossed: 4/13/23
• Enrolled: 4/18/23
• Passed: 5/5/23
• Chaptered: 5/18/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 29; Title 57 and Title 62, Chapter 35, relative to protective services.

Impact

The implications of HB 0379 extend to the licensing and operational protocols for businesses that employ security personnel. The bill specifies that the Alcoholic Beverage Commission or beer boards may suspend licenses or permits for on-premises consumption if establishments employ improperly registered security guards. This measure holds both security companies and alcohol-serving establishments accountable for compliance with state regulations, aiming to reduce risks associated with unregulated security operations.

Summary

House Bill 0379 amends several sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting the regulation of security services and the employment of security personnel in establishments serving alcohol. One of the key changes involves making it unlawful for any person to knowingly employ an unregistered individual as a security guard or officer. Violations of this provision are classified as Class A misdemeanors, which carry a penalty of fines but not jail time. This amendment aims to enhance the oversight and accountability of security staff in public venues, particularly those that serve alcoholic beverages.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 0379 appears to be largely supportive among lawmakers who emphasize the importance of public safety and the need for qualified personnel in security roles. Proponents argue that this legislation will mitigate potential security threats arising from unqualified guards in alcohol-serving venues. However, some discussions hint at concerns regarding the impact of such regulations on small businesses and the operational costs associated with ensuring compliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the burden that these regulations may place on smaller establishments that require security for events but may struggle with the costs of hiring properly registered personnel. Additionally, there is a debate about how swiftly the licensing bodies can enforce penalties, potentially impacting business operations. The balancing act between ensuring public safety and supporting local businesses remains a key topic within legislative discussions surrounding the bill.