Tennessee House Bill HB0297

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/23
• Refer: 1/21/23
• Refer: 3/8/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Refer: 3/22/23
• Refer: 3/28/23
• Chaptered: 5/3/23
• Passed: 5/3/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 70-4-107, relative to game and fish proclamations.

Impact

The impact of HB 0297 on state law is significant as it modifies existing statutory procedures regarding wildlife management. By amending the timeframe for when proclamations become effective, the bill enables more responsive actions by wildlife authorities during emergencies. This change is anticipated to benefit both conservation efforts and recreational users, as it allows for better management of fish and game resources that can fluctuate dramatically due to environmental conditions. Additionally, it establishes a direct line of communication through the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency’s website for the public to access these proclamations immediately.

Summary

House Bill 0297 proposes amendments to Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically concerning game and fish proclamations. The main objective of this bill is to streamline the process for these proclamations by allowing them to become effective 30 days after they are filed with the Secretary of State. This amendment would apply an expedited process for enacting regulations under emergency conditions, allowing for closures, reopenings, or extensions of seasons without the usual delay. The bill aims to enhance the efficiency of wildlife management in Tennessee, addressing urgent situations as they arise more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 0297 appears to be largely favorable, particularly among stakeholders in wildlife management and conservation. Proponents argue that the bill enhances the state's ability to protect wildlife populations and manage hunting and fishing activities more dynamically. However, there may be concerns from some advocacy groups regarding swift regulatory changes that could lead to overreactions in management practices or insufficient public awareness if proclamations are implemented too rapidly.

Contention

Notable points of contention are likely to arise around the speed at which regulations can now be enacted. While the ability to act quickly during emergencies is seen as advantageous, critics may argue that it undermines thorough public input and the usual deliberative process associated with changing regulations. The bill’s provisions could raise concerns about transparency and the potential for mismanagement if rapid changes are made without proper notification and due process.