South Dakota 2025 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1163

Introduced
1/30/25  
Refer
2/3/25  

Caption

Make an appropriation for a grant to assist in the construction and equipping of a veteran’s skilled trade center.

Summary

House Bill 1163 makes a one-time general fund appropriation of $3,218,277 to the Department of Veterans Affairs to award a grant for the construction and equipping of a veteran’s skilled trade center near Hot Springs. The stated purpose of the center is to provide veterans with mental health support, PTSD counseling, and job skills training, combining behavioral health services with workforce development in a single facility. The bill does not create a new regulatory program or amend existing substantive law; instead, it authorizes state spending for a specific capital and programmatic project. It directs the Department of Veterans Affairs to administer the grant, requires the secretary to approve vouchers and the state auditor to issue warrants, and sets a reversion date for any unspent or unobligated funds by June 30, 2028. The act becomes effective June 28, 2025.

Impact

HB1163 would affect state finances by appropriating general fund dollars to the Department of Veterans Affairs for a targeted grant, rather than changing eligibility rules, benefits, or agency authority in a broad way. Its practical impact would be to support development of a veterans’ facility near Hot Springs that could serve as a hub for mental health services, PTSD counseling, and vocational training, potentially benefiting veterans, service providers, and the local community. The bill also establishes standard fiscal controls for expenditure approval and fund reversion if the money is not used by the deadline.

Sentiment

The available vote history suggests the bill had meaningful support but was not unanimous. Early referral received no opposition, while a later tabling motion passed 16-2, indicating some members were willing to delay or reconsider the measure despite overall favorable sentiment toward supporting veterans. No committee transcripts are available, so the discussion record does not show detailed arguments for or against the bill.

Contention

The main point of contention appears to be whether the state should commit more than $3.2 million in general funds to a single project and whether the proposed center is the best use of appropriated money. Supporters are likely focused on veterans’ services, mental health treatment, and workforce training, while any opposition or hesitation likely centers on fiscal priorities, project scope, and the decision to fund a specific facility through a grant rather than through a broader veterans’ program. The tabling vote suggests at least some legislative concern about timing, structure, or cost.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.