South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB182

Introduced
1/25/24  
Refer
1/25/24  
Report Pass
2/2/24  
Engrossed
2/5/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/23/24  
Enrolled
3/4/24  

Caption

Repeal and revise certain provisions regarding the petition circulation process to comply with federal court decisions.

Impact

The passage of SB182 is expected to enhance the transparency and integrity of the petition circulation process. By mandating that petition circulators provide specific handouts containing relevant information about the petition, including sponsor information and details of the proposed measure, the bill aims to ensure that voters are well-informed before signing. This amendment process could significantly affect how initiated measures are placed on ballots, potentially increasing public engagement and awareness regarding state legislative changes.

Summary

Senate Bill 182 aims to amend and repeal several provisions regarding the process of petition circulation in South Dakota. This legislation efforts to align state laws with recent federal court rulings, thereby revising the requirements and procedures that govern how petitions for initiated amendments to the Constitution and other measures are circulated. It includes specific guidelines for filing petitions, ensuring that circulators provide clear information to signers, and specifies conditions under which signatures must be collected and submitted to the Secretary of State.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB182 appears to be supportive among lawmakers who advocate for clearer regulations and greater transparency in the electoral process. Proponents believe that these changes will facilitate a better-informed electorate, improving the democratic process. Conversely, there may be concerns about potential restrictions on grassroots campaigning and the difficulty of obtaining signatures under the new provisions, indicating some dissent among grassroots activists and smaller organizations.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB182 is the balance between enhancing transparency and potentially burdening the petition process. Detractors could argue that the new requirements may complicate the circulation of petitions, especially for smaller groups or those engaged in advocacy efforts. This aspect of the bill raises questions about the accessibility of the referendum process and whether the changes may inadvertently hinder public participation in initiating legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD HB1087

Prohibit the use of paid petition circulators.

SD HB1267

Prohibit the use of paid petition circulators, and provide a penalty therefor.

SD SB1180

Circulating or signing nomination papers and certain petitions.

SD LB604

Change provisions regarding initiative and referendum petitions

SD SB91

Revise the requirements for a petition to initiate a measure or constitutional amendment or to refer a law.

SD SB0529

Elections: campaign practices; individual circulating a petition; prohibit from being paid for each petition signature collected, and require petition circulators to be paid an hourly wage. Amends 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.1 - 168.992) by adding secs. 483b, 544g, 590i & 957a.

SD SB0530

Elections: petitions; petition circulator to provide or read the summary of the purpose of the petition to the petition signer; require. Amends 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.1 - 168.992) by adding sec. 482g.

SD AB541

Revises provisions relating to indigent petitioners. (BDR 3-1153)

SD H0726

Amends, repeals, and adds to existing law to revise provisions regarding certain election procedures.

SD H0021

Petition Process

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.