South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1060

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Engrossed
2/21/24  
Refer
2/22/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Enrolled
2/27/24  

Caption

Revise certain provisions related to travel reimbursement.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1060 would directly affect the reimbursement rates for state officers traveling for official state business. Notably, the bill stipulates that the mileage reimbursement rate for using a privately owned vehicle can vary based on the type of vehicle and the distance of travel, which emphasizes the need for policy alignment with the US Internal Revenue Service standards. Furthermore, it addresses the reimbursement for lodging and meals, proposing maximum limits to ensure fiscal accountability and efficient governance.

Summary

House Bill 1060 focuses on updating and revising various provisions related to travel reimbursement for state employees and officials in South Dakota. The primary aim of the bill is to clarify compensation protocols, including reimbursement rates for mileage, lodging expenses, and allowances for meals while performing state duties. By establishing uniform policies, the bill seeks to ensure consistency in how travel-related costs are handled across various state departments and agencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1060 appears to be favorable among legislative members, as indicated by the unanimous voting outcome (33-0) in the recent session. The clear delineation of reimbursement processes and rates is regarded as a beneficial move towards enhanced transparency and budget management within state operations. Such measures are welcomed in a context where budgeting for state expenses often draws scrutiny and demands accountability from the public and legislative bodies alike.

Contention

One point of contention that may arise during discussions of HB 1060 involves the specific reimbursement rates set for various types of travel. While the bill incorporates allowances intended to reduce fiscal burdens for state employees, debates may emerge regarding whether the proposed limits are adequate or too restrictive. Additional scrutiny may focus on how these changes would impact the ability of agencies with different budgets to accommodate their employees when working in the field, particularly in remote areas where travel can be more expensive.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD SB52

Public Office Travel Reimbursement

SD SB73

Revise provisions relating to state financial practices.

SD HB723

State employees; require reimbursement for travel expenses to be paid within 10 days of submitting expense documentation.

SD AB459

Revises provisions relating to certain providers of transportation services. (BDR 58-1003)

SD SB2084

Authorized travel expense and lodging reimbursement rates.

SD H10

Study State Travel Allowance Reimbursements

SD S1016

Amends and adds to existing law to revise provisions regarding certain fees.

SD SB2684

Medicaid reimbursements; revise certain provisions relating to a psychiatric residential treatment facility in DeSoto County.

SD SB2195

Medicaid reimbursements; revise certain provisions relating to a psychiatric residential treatment facility in DeSoto County.

SD HF3058

Medical assistance payment rate increased for nonemergency medical transportation for client reimbursement.

Similar Bills

SC H4305

Wellness reimbursement program

CA AB1429

Behavioral health reimbursement.

TX HB4582

Relating to reimbursement of infrastructure costs incurred by a developer of certain housing developments by certain municipalities and counties.

NV AB511

Revises provisions relating to insurance. (BDR 57-697)

WV HB5527

Relating to Wellness Reimbursement Programs

CA AB2640

Commission on State Mandates: state mandates.

CA AB964

Commission on State Mandates: state mandates.

AZ HB2447

insurance; reimbursement rates; nurse anesthetist