A HOUSE RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS THE PROFOUND SORROW OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES UPON THE PASSING OF CHARLES DANNY "CHARLIE" MCLEAN OF RICHLAND COUNTY AND TO EXTEND THEIR DEEPEST SYMPATHY TO HIS LARGE AND LOVING FAMILY AND HIS MANY FRIENDS.
Summary
H5346 is a House resolution expressing the South Carolina House of Representatives’ sorrow over the death of Charles Danny “Charlie” McLean of Richland County and extending sympathy to his family and friends. The resolution recites biographical details about Mr. McLean, including his birth in Ellenton, his Christian faith, and his long career in law enforcement.
The resolution highlights his service with the Richland County Sheriff’s Department, his tenure as chief of police for the Forest Acres Police Department, later security work at Richland Fashion Mall and William Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Hospital, and his return to part-time work with FAPD after retirement. It also notes his church involvement, family life, and community ties, and directs that a copy of the resolution be presented to his family.
Impact
H5346 does not change state law, create new programs, or appropriate funds. Its legal effect is limited to a formal expression of condolence by the House of Representatives and the presentation of the resolution to the McLean family. The bill primarily affects legislative records and serves as an honorary tribute rather than a substantive policy measure.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly respectful and sympathetic. The text itself is laudatory, emphasizing Mr. McLean’s public service, faith, family devotion, and community involvement. No votes, committee debate, or recorded opposition are provided, and the available context suggests the measure is noncontroversial and ceremonial in nature.
Contention
There are no notable points of contention in the available materials. The resolution is a memorial tribute, and the context includes no committee transcripts, no recorded votes, and no evidence of disagreement. Any discussion would likely have centered on honoring Mr. McLean’s law-enforcement career and community service, rather than on policy differences or legislative disputes.