South Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

South Carolina House Bill H4819

Introduced
1/13/26  

Caption

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ENACTING THE "UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW PREVENTION ACT" BY ADDING ARTICLE 9 TO CHAPTER 5, TITLE 40 SO AS TO PROHIBIT UNLICENSED INDIVIDUALS FROM PROVIDING LEGAL SERVICES FOR COMPENSATION, TO PROVIDE DEFINITIONS, TO ESTABLISH CRIMINAL PENALTIES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR CIVIL ENFORCEMENT, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND THE DISGORGEMENT OF COMPENSATION RECEIVED IN VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE, AMONG OTHER THINGS.

Impact

This legislation modifies existing statutes by establishing specific penalties for violations. Offenses can lead to civil penalties up to $5,000 and mandatory disgorgement of any fees obtained through unauthorized practices. Furthermore, it clarifies that individuals can still represent themselves, and certain non-legal roles such as mediators are exempt from these restrictions. The bill aims to eliminate deceptive legal practices that could jeopardize individuals seeking legal assistance, thereby improving the overall integrity of legal services in South Carolina.

Summary

House Bill 4819, known as the Unauthorized Practice of Law Prevention Act, aims to strengthen the regulation of legal services in South Carolina by prohibiting unlicensed individuals from providing legal advice or services for compensation. The bill introduces a clear definition of legal services and delineates what constitutes unlawful practice, thereby enhancing consumer protection in legal matters. It allows for civil enforcement mechanisms, including injunctive relief, and permits the Attorney General to impose penalties on those engaging in unauthorized practice.

Contention

During discussions, some stakeholders expressed concerns about the broad definitions and implications of the bill, especially regarding its impact on divorce coaches and non-lawyers who provide guidance in family law matters. There is potential contention regarding how these provisions might affect individuals who offer support without formal legal qualifications. Critics worry that the bill may inadvertently restrict access to valuable resources for those unable to afford licensed legal representation, creating a barrier to assistance in legal matters, particularly in family law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.