A HOUSE RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS THE PROFOUND SORROW OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES UPON THE PASSING OF LANDON CALE BODIE OF LEESVILLE AND TO EXTEND THE DEEPEST SYMPATHY TO HIS FAMILY AND MANY FRIENDS.
Summary
H3678 is a simple House resolution expressing the South Carolina House of Representatives’ sorrow over the death of Landon Cale Bodie of Leesville and extending sympathy to his family and friends. The resolution recounts his life briefly, noting that he was an 18-year-old recent graduate of Blythewood High School, an FFA member with an interest in agriculture, a young man who enjoyed carpentry, hunting, and fishing, and a volunteer firefighter with the Circle Fire Department.
The resolution does not change any substantive law, create a program, or appropriate funds. Its legal effect is ceremonial and commemorative only: it directs that the House formally record its condolences and provide a copy of the resolution to the family. As a result, no statutes are amended and no rights or obligations are altered for any person or agency.
Impact
H3678 has no direct impact on state statutes, regulations, or government operations beyond the House’s formal expression of condolence. It is a commemorative resolution that honors an individual and recognizes his family, school, agricultural involvement, and volunteer service, but it does not create enforceable legal changes or affect any public or private parties in a regulatory sense.
Sentiment
The sentiment around the bill is uniformly respectful and sympathetic. Because the measure is a memorial resolution, it reflects a solemn, supportive tone rather than policy debate, and the available context shows no recorded opposition, committee controversy, or vote division. The resolution is intended to honor Landon Bodie’s memory and acknowledge his service to his community.
Contention
There are no notable points of contention in the available record. The bill is a noncontroversial sympathy resolution, and there are no committee transcripts, recorded votes, or amendments indicating disagreement. Any discussion would likely have centered on the appropriateness of honoring a young community member and volunteer firefighter, but the provided materials show no dispute over the resolution’s content or purpose.