A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 43-35-310, RELATING TO THE ADULT PROTECTION COORDINATING COUNCIL, SO AS TO CORRECT A MEMBER AGENCY NAME.
Summary
H3023 is a narrow technical amendment to South Carolina law governing the Adult Protection Coordinating Council. The bill updates the name of one member agency in Section 43-35-310(A)(2)(b), changing the reference from the “Office on Aging” to the “Department on Aging,” with the executive director or a designee continuing to serve on the council. The measure does not create new programs, expand eligibility, or alter the council’s duties; it simply corrects the statutory language to match the current agency name.
Because the bill is limited to a nomenclature correction, its practical effect is administrative rather than substantive. It helps ensure the statute accurately reflects the state agency’s current title and avoids confusion in appointments, references, and coordination among adult protection stakeholders. The bill takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
Impact
The bill amends Section 43-35-310 of the South Carolina Code of Laws, which establishes the membership of the Adult Protection Coordinating Council. Its only legal change is to replace an outdated agency reference with the current name, “Department on Aging,” thereby conforming the statute to existing state government structure. No duties, powers, funding provisions, or eligibility rules are changed, and the affected parties are limited to the council and the aging agency designated to participate on it.
Sentiment
The available record suggests the bill is noncontroversial and administrative in nature. There are no committee transcripts, recorded votes, or indications of opposition in the provided materials. Measures that simply correct statutory names or agency references are typically viewed favorably because they improve clarity without changing policy, and H3023 appears to fit that pattern.
Contention
No notable points of contention are evident in the provided record. The bill does not appear to raise policy disputes, fiscal concerns, or jurisdictional issues; the only change is a technical correction to a member agency name. If any concern existed, it would likely be limited to ensuring the statutory language matches the current organizational name used by the state aging agency.