RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--PROCEDURE GENERALLY --, EVIDENCE
Summary
H8054 amends Rhode Island’s evidence statute governing proof of life expectancy and work-life expectancy in court, commission, or agency proceedings. The bill directs decision-makers to use the most recent federal life tables from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and work-life expectancy tables from the U.S. Department of Labor, and it includes a statutory chart of completed ages and corresponding expectancy values. It also states that determinations of life or work expectancy may not be based on race, ethnicity, or sex.
The bill further provides that the life and work expectancy tables may be introduced through an official publication or by a copy printed in the Rhode Island General Laws, and that the published tables are sufficient proof without additional foundation or authentication if advance notice and a copy are served on the opposing party by certified mail at least 10 days before use, with proof of notice filed with the court. The act takes effect upon passage.
Impact
This bill would revise General Laws § 9-19-38 to standardize how life expectancy and work-life expectancy are proven in Rhode Island proceedings, replacing any reliance on less formal or variable methods with specified statistical tables and a codified chart. It affects courts, commissions, agencies, litigants, and experts who present or challenge expectancy evidence, and it expressly bars use of race, ethnicity, or sex in those determinations.
Sentiment
The bill’s stated purpose and caption suggest a generally technical, procedural measure aimed at making expectancy evidence more uniform and objective. No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no documented public debate in the supplied materials; based on the text, the measure appears to be framed as a neutral evidentiary update rather than a controversial policy change.
Contention
The principal point of contention embedded in the bill is the instruction that life and work expectancy determinations not be based on race, ethnicity, or sex. Supporters would likely view this as a fairness and consistency safeguard, while critics could argue it limits the use of demographic data that some may consider statistically relevant in certain contexts. Another possible issue is the bill’s adoption of a specific statutory table and notice procedure, which could be seen as simplifying proof but also constraining evidentiary flexibility.
Provides that evidence of life or work expectancy shall be based on statistical data using blended statistics and shall not be based on race, ethnicity or sex.
Prohibits gender transition procedures for all minors, uses of public funds, discipline for health care providers, a 30 year statute of limitation, after reaching age of majority, and right to a civil action for damages.
Provides equal Medicare for infants born-alive as a result of abortion procedure/natural delivery with violations subject to criminal penalties for medical personnel/loss of license/civil action for damages.
Amends the administrative procedures act and provides that on the review of an agency decision by a court upon appeal, the court shall decide questions of law without deference to any previous determination or interpretation of the law by the agency.