RELATING TO TAXATION - AGREEMENT TO PHASE OUT CORPORATE INCENTIVES, COMPACT ACT
Impact
The bill proposes to amend Title 44 of the General Laws regarding taxation, adding a new chapter focused on this compact. If enacted, the implications go beyond mere economic measures; they represent a significant shift in how states interact and compete for business. The enforcement of the compact will rest with the attorneys general of the participating states, who will ensure compliance with its provisions. This could lead to a more stable business environment where corporate incentives are consistent and predictable across state lines, potentially fostering better inter-state cooperation.
Summary
House Bill H7385, also known as the Agreement to Phase Out Corporate Incentives Compact Act, aims to establish a legislative compact among at least two states. The core intent of this bill is to prohibit the selective use of subsidies by any participating state to attract or retain specific industries or companies within their borders. It seeks to create a level playing field by preventing 'poaching'—the practice of incentivizing companies to relocate from one state to another through economic incentives such as grants, tax breaks, and favorable bonding statuses.
Contention
While the bill aims to curtail aggressive subsidy wars between states, concerns have been raised regarding its potential impact on local economies. Critics argue that limiting subsidies could hinder states’ abilities to attract major businesses, especially in economically disadvantaged areas. Proponents, however, believe stabilizing the subsidy landscape will lead to healthier economic competition without compromising state revenues significantly. The compact underscores a balance between fostering growth and preventing governmental overreach into market dynamics.
Establishes a compact agreement among at least two (2) states to prohibit the use of subsidies to selectively retain industry or company entice relocation from one state to another state or to open a new facility.
Establishes a compact agreement among at least two (2) states to prohibit the use of subsidies to selectively retain industry or company entice relocation from one state to another state or to open a new facility.
Prohibits noncompete agreements except for noncompete agreements between a seller and buyer of a business; creates civil action for an employer for the violation of an agreement by employee regarding disclosure or wrongful utilization of trade secrets.
Exempts from taxation the real and tangible personal property of Amos House, provided it remains a qualified tax-exempt corporation pursuant to §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Exempts from taxation the real and tangible personal property of Codac, Inc., a Rhode Island nonprofit domestic corporation, located at 45 Royal Little Drive in Providence, Rhode Island.
Exempts from taxation the non-commercial real and tangible personal property of Southside Community Land Trust, a Rhode Island domestic nonprofit corporation, located in Providence, Rhode Island.
Exempts from taxation the real and tangible personal property of Codac, Inc., a Rhode Island nonprofit domestic corporation, located at 45 Royal Little Drive in Providence, Rhode Island.