Mandates additional state education funding for the mental and behavioral health of students equal to 2% of the district’s total expenditures, and require those funds be used to hire staff such as school social workers, and behavioral specialists.
Summary
S0256 amends Rhode Island’s Education Equity and Property Tax Relief Act to add a new categorical education aid requirement for student mental and behavioral health. It would require the state to provide additional funding equal to 2% of each eligible district’s total expenditures, and those funds would have to be used to hire and retain staff such as school social workers, school counselors, school psychologists, paraprofessionals, behavioral specialists, and registered behavior technicians (RBTs).
To qualify for the funding, districts would need to meet several conditions: they must be below specified staffing ratios for social workers, counselors, and psychologists, or have elementary classrooms without a full-time paraprofessional, behavior specialist, or RBT; they must comply with the school improvement team law; and they must maintain policies ensuring students removed for escalated behavior receive de-escalation support before returning to class. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education would be required to review performance reports, approve fund use before expenditures, and ensure the money supplements rather than replaces existing district spending.
Impact
The bill would expand the list of state-funded categorical programs under Rhode Island’s foundation education aid system by adding a dedicated mental and behavioral health funding stream. It would create a new entitlement-like formula tied to district expenditures, impose eligibility and reporting conditions on districts, and give the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education oversight authority over how the funds are used. In practical terms, it would affect school districts statewide by directing new state aid toward student support staffing and behavior-related services, while also requiring compliance and documentation before funds are released.
Sentiment
The bill’s stated purpose and structure suggest generally supportive sentiment toward increasing school-based mental and behavioral health resources. The bill text and explanation frame the measure as a targeted investment in student supports, with an emphasis on staffing shortages and research-based services. No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no recorded opposition or amendment debate in the available materials.
Contention
The main points of potential contention are the cost and the conditions attached to the funding. Requiring state aid equal to 2% of district expenditures could be significant for the state budget, and districts may question whether the staffing-ratio thresholds, compliance requirements, and pre-approval process are too restrictive or administratively burdensome. Another possible issue is the bill’s instruction that funds not be used for activities districts are already funding, which could raise disputes over what counts as supplemental versus existing spending. No specific opposing legislators, districts, or advocacy groups are identified in the available record.
Relating to the authority of the Wood County Central Hospital District of Wood County, Texas, to provide brain and memory care services to residents of the hospital district through the creation and operation of brain and memory health care services districts.