Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

Rhode Island House Bill H5898

Introduced
2/28/25  
Refer
2/28/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Engrossed
4/3/25  

Caption

Amends the general law relative to right-of-way of pedestrians to reference the schedule of violations for the adjudication of traffic offenses contained in § 31-41.1-4.

Summary

H5898 makes a narrow amendment to Rhode Island’s pedestrian right-of-way penalty provision. Under current law, a person who violates the pedestrian right-of-way statutes in §§ 31-17-1 through 31-17-5 may be fined up to $75. The bill keeps that penalty in place but updates the citation so that the fine is expressly subject to the broader traffic-offense fine schedule in § 31-41.1-4. In practical terms, the bill is a technical conforming change within the motor vehicle code. It does not alter the underlying pedestrian right-of-way rules or create a new offense; instead, it aligns the penalty language with the state’s existing schedule of violations for traffic adjudication. The act would take effect immediately upon passage.

Impact

The bill amends § 31-17-5.1 of the Rhode Island General Laws, which governs penalties for violations of pedestrian right-of-way provisions. Its main legal effect is to cross-reference the traffic offense fine schedule in § 31-41.1-4, making the penalty framework consistent with the state’s adjudication system for traffic violations. The affected parties are drivers and other persons subject to pedestrian right-of-way laws, as well as courts and enforcement agencies applying traffic fines.

Sentiment

The available record suggests broad, noncontroversial support for the bill. It passed the House on April 3, 2025 by a wide margin, 62-2, indicating general agreement that the measure is a routine cleanup or technical update rather than a substantive policy change. No committee testimony is available, and there is no indication of organized opposition in the provided materials.

Contention

Because the bill is a narrow conforming amendment, there is little visible contention in the record. Any disagreement appears limited to the two dissenting votes on final passage, but no reasons are provided. The only substantive issue reflected in the text is whether the pedestrian right-of-way penalty should continue to be stated as a standalone fine cap or be tied directly to the traffic-offense schedule in § 31-41.1-4.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.