Rhode Island Senate Bill S2390

Rhode Island 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/22
• Refer: 2/15/22
• Report Pass: 3/1/22
• Passed: 3/8/22

Caption

Senate Resolution Creating A Special Legislative Commission To Study And Review The Cost And Status Of The State Of Rhode Island Owned, Vacant, And Abandoned Properties And Provide Recommendations For Methods To Mitigate The Associated Expenses (creates A 13 Member Commission To Study And Make Recommendations For Mitigating The Associated Costs For State Owned Vacant And Abandoned Property, And Would Report Back By February 10, 2023, And Expire On March 21, 2023.)

Impact

The resolution seeks to address not only the direct costs incurred by the state due to maintaining these vacant properties but also the broader implications for community safety and neighborhood vitality. By studying the overarching issue of abandoned properties, the commission is expected to propose ways to reclaim and revitalize these areas, potentially streamlining processes for returning tax-delinquent properties to productive use. This could ultimately influence state laws concerning property management, urban planning, and local economic development.

Summary

Bill S2390 establishes a special legislative commission designed to study and review the costs and status of state-owned vacant and abandoned properties in Rhode Island. Recognizing that the state, particularly areas like Providence, has been severely affected by the mortgage foreclosure crisis leading to an increase in these problematic properties, the bill aims to examine the financial implications of maintaining such properties and the negative impact they have on surrounding communities. The commission, consisting of thirteen members including Senate representatives and various state officials, is tasked with providing actionable recommendations by February 10, 2023.

Contention

Although the bill outlines constructive measures for dealing with vacant and abandoned properties, points of contention may arise regarding the effectiveness of the proposed commission and the feasibility of implementing its recommendations. Critics might question whether the creation of a new commission will lead to meaningful change or whether existing frameworks and policies could be better utilized. Moreover, there may be debate about how to appropriately fund any initiatives that result from the commission's findings, given that these properties may require significant financial resources for successful remediation and rehabilitation.