Video & Transcript Research : 'zoning preemption'

Page 1 of 215
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 2/25/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our pedi are in a war zone.
  • Preemption is not unusual.
  • If you don't believe me, look at your local zoning code.
  • If you don't believe me, look at your local zoning code.
  • If you don't believe me, look at your local zoning code.
Bills: HF3351
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Commerce and Economic Development Feb 13th, 2026 at 05:24 pm

House Commerce & Economic Development Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • They can do the normal ones that are offered for that same zone businesses.
  • But we can't look at zoning and child care in a vacuum.
  • We urge the passage of SB 96 because unnecessary local zoning barriers are unintentionally discouraging
  • question on page six, Madam Chair, where it talks about the number of stacking spaces required by the zoning
Bills: HB303, SB96, HM6
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Feb 7th, 2026 at 06:52 pm

Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2024, my wife and I lost our home insurance because our carrier declared our house was in a fire zone
  • In 2024, my wife and I lost our home insurance because our carrier declared our house was in a fire zone
  • So we are going to finish off tonight with Senate Bill 96, which is a regulated child care zoning requirements
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Health and Public Affairs Feb 4th, 2026 at 06:25 pm

Senate Health & Public Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • In commercial zones, mixed-use zones, and high-density residential zones.
  • Does it supersede local zoning ordinances?
  • It does not prohibit zoning.
  • planning and zoning.
  • It just ensures that something in a zoning district is treated the same way everything else in that zoning
Bills: SB20, SB53, SB86, SB96, SB129
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Community Affairs Jan 27th, 2026

Community Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And last year, as part of that effort, we clarified the application of the zoning preemption by defining
  • This is a state preemption bill, and it's titled preemption to the state, but I feel like it's more of
  • to end all preemptions.
  • in that preemption as well.
  • And then tackling on other unrelated preemptions on permitting, fences, parking,... ...preemptions on
Summary: The committee took up a series of land use, housing, local government, and public notice bills, along with a firefighter cancer bill and a bill on temporary door locking devices. SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits and prevention was explained as clarifying access to death benefits and a one-time cancer payment for firefighters; it was reported favorably. SB 1612 required local governments to accept electronic payments online; it also passed favorably. SB 1180 created a recall framework for elected community development district board members and, through a strike-all amendment, also addressed synthetic turf enforcement and expanded compact urban mixed-use district definitions; the amendment was adopted and the bill was reported favorably. SB 936 allowed temporary door locking devices above the finished floor and directed the Building Commission to add standards to the Florida Building Code; it passed favorably. The committee also considered SB 380 on legal notices, which would let certain local government entities publish notices on their own websites or other designated sites instead of relying on newspapers in more cases. The Florida Press Association, Common Cause, and newspaper representatives opposed the bill, arguing it would fragment public notice access and make notices harder to find and verify, while supporters said it would modernize and reduce costs. The bill’s amendment clarified which agencies were covered, and the committee reported the bill favorably. SB 962 on affordable housing narrowed prior zoning preemption language so working farms and farm operations would not be unintentionally captured by Live Local-style rules; it passed favorably. SB 1444 on state preemption and religious expression, private clubs, and minor home construction drew support from religious freedom advocates and opposition from cities and counties, which warned of vague terms and overbroad preemption; it was reported favorably. The committee then approved SB 218, which would limit the reach of last session’s hurricane recovery land-use preemption to counties actually damaged by hurricanes and restore normal local land-use authority in unaffected counties. SB 1434 on infill redevelopment would streamline zoning and subdivision approvals for environmentally impacted parcels in certain urban counties to encourage housing on contaminated or underused land; counties and local-government groups opposed it as an overbroad preemption and raised concerns about the environmental threshold and density provisions, but the bill was reported favorably. SB 1020 on chickees prohibited local ordinances from blocking chickee construction if setback requirements are met and made unauthorized attempts to circumvent the building code a misdemeanor; it passed favorably. Finally, SB 948 on local government land development regulations and orders, as amended, proposed a statewide starter-home framework with lot-split and zoning changes to increase housing supply; local-government and planning groups warned it would function as a rigid statewide zoning code and could drive overdevelopment, while housing advocates supported it as necessary state action. The committee reported the bill favorably after extensive debate.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) May 15th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • No, this is the electronic delivery of municipal zoning changes if the resident opts in.
  • Okay, this is electronic zoning changes if the residents opt in.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met with a quorum and took up a series of pending bills, mostly local-government measures. Early action included final committee approval of Senate Bill 1633 and S.J.R. 60, followed by Senate Bill 3038 and Senate Bill 3045, both reported favorably and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also considered House Bill 24, adopted a committee substitute, and reported the substitute version favorably; House Bill 2025 was likewise reported favorably and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. Members then handled several companion and local bills, including House Bill 2713 as the companion to Senate Bill 1331, which was reported favorably and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 3348, House Bill 3370, House Bill 3505, and House Bill 4506 were each reported favorably, with no objections to local-and-uncontested placement. House Bill 5424 passed on a 6-1 vote, and House Bill 5652 passed with one present-not-voting, both also sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted substitutes and reported House Bill 3687 and House Bill 4205, though both were later reconsidered because the wrong script had been read. After reconsideration, House Bill 3687 and House Bill 4205 were each re-voted and reported favorably to the full Senate, with both placed on the local and uncontested calendar. Senate Bill 3071 was also reported out on a 5-2 vote after adoption of a committee substitute. The meeting ended with no further business and the committee standing at recess subject to the call of the chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • for Representative Bonham, as you said, has to do with the electronic notices of municipalities and zoning
  • For instance, in 2023, the City of Austin spent a total of $315,000 just on mailing zoning notices.
  • Everyone in the city of Dallas spent roughly $125,000 mailing zoning notices.
  • Members, this bill is about amortization as a process whereby a municipality changes the zoning in an
  • The subject of House Bill 24 is the procedure to change the zoning of property.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • No, this is electronic delivery for municipal zoning changes. If the residents opt in.
  • Okay, this is electronic zoning changes if the residents opt in.