Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2400 also establishes content removal requirements.
• Did I get that about right, just generally?
• Currently, that goes to the general fund.
• So our opposition is not in your stakeholdering process, but just on the general content of the legislation
• So our opposition is not in your stakeholder process, but just on the general content of the legislation

Bills: HB2439, HB2483, HB2400

Keywords: public health, tobacco regulation, smoking cessation, vapor products, health policy, youth prevention, data broker, registry, consumer protection, privacy, data regulation, social media, content creation, online platforms, digital marketing, user-generated content, 904, all

Summary: The committee held public hearings on three bills. House Bill 2483 would create an annual data broker registry at the Department of Licensing, requiring covered businesses to register, pay a fee, and disclose information about the data they collect, sell, security measures, and consumer opt-out options. Representative Kloba said the bill is intended to make data collection and resale more visible to consumers and address harms such as scams, surveillance, and misuse of purchased data. TechNet, AWB, and the Washington Retail Association opposed the bill as drafted, saying the definition of data broker is too broad and could sweep in businesses that are not true data brokers, while also noting the need for clearer alignment with other states. Committee members raised questions about public records data, government entities, and whether businesses scraping publicly available information would be covered; the sponsor said publicly available data remains carved out, but businesses that collect and sell such data would register. No vote was taken. House Bill 2400 would regulate monetized social media content featuring children. The bill would require vloggers meeting revenue and nexus thresholds to register with the Department of Revenue, create trust-account requirements for minors featured in monetized content, allow young adults to request deletion of monetized childhood images, require reporting and user education by platforms, and impose civil penalties and statutory damages. Representative Reeves said the bill is meant to distinguish ordinary family posting from monetizing children online and to extend workplace-style protections to children featured in paid content. TechNet and AWB opposed the bill, saying social media platforms should not be placed in the middle of parent-child trust arrangements and objecting to the private right of action, while suggesting more work during the interim. No vote was taken. House Bill 2439 would overhaul cigarette, tobacco, and vapor product policy. The staff briefing described a responsible vendor program, higher license fees and penalties, new distributor and manufacturer requirements, a study of vapor product extended producer responsibility, age-verification changes, bans on certain imitation or entertainment vapor products, removal of state preemption for local tobacco regulation, and changes to how tobacco tax revenue is allocated to public health accounts. Representative Reeves said the bill is a compromise after months of stakeholder work and is aimed at reducing youth access while keeping a regulated adult market. Supporters, including public health groups, King County, the American Heart Association, and pediatricians, backed the youth-prevention measures, local authority, and funding for prevention and public health services. Opponents, including retail, grocery, tobacco, and vapor industry representatives, argued the bill would create a patchwork of local rules, raise costs sharply for small businesses, burden enforcement, and potentially drive more activity into the illicit market. The hearing remained open with additional testimony and questions, and no final action was taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, it requires parental consent before a known minor, defined as a user under the age of 17 whom
• Evidence is mounting that social media can expose children to harmful content online.
• Thank you. extreme content to minors.
• The Attorney General can set these standards at any time without legislative approval.
• I'm speaking to the portion of the bill that addresses the type of content shown to minors.

Bills: SB5976, SB6111, SB6250, SB6257, SB6289, SGA9060, SGA9169, SGA9265, SGA9266

Keywords: commercial email, spam regulations, online marketing, privacy, consumer protection, SB 6111, Washington Protecting Children Online Act, online child safety, minor privacy, age verification, parental consent, social media regulation, digital platforms, user-generated content, content moderation, online harms, youth protection, data privacy, geolocation, targeted advertising

Summary: The committee heard briefings, sponsor remarks, and public testimony on several bills. SB 5976 would amend the Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act by requiring a more reliable basis for knowing an email is sent to a Washington resident, narrowing subject-line liability to misleading statements material to a transaction, and limiting damages and Consumer Protection Act claims unless a recipient received, reviewed, and detrimentally relied on the email. Supporters, including retailers, e-commerce groups, hospitality businesses, and business associations, said the current law has led to a wave of class-action litigation over routine marketing emails; opponents argued the bill would weaken consumer protections against deceptive marketing. No vote was taken. SB 6111 would require age verification for certain social media accounts, parental consent for known minors, restrictions on use of minors’ data, and Attorney General enforcement, with a limited private right of action for parents or guardians. The sponsor and supporters, including PTA, parents, and mental health advocates, said the bill is needed to reduce minors’ exposure to harmful content and to give parents more control. Opponents from technology and privacy groups raised constitutional concerns, data-security issues, and uncertainty about how platforms would verify parental consent. No vote was taken. SB 6257 would allow trainee real estate appraiser license timelines to be tolled for documented illness, similar to existing tolling for military service. SB 6250 would raise the maximum principal amount for small loans from $700 to $1,200, with future inflation adjustments; the sponsor and Moneytree said the limit should reflect inflation and still preserve existing safeguards, while consumer, labor, housing, and anti-poverty advocates warned it would deepen debt cycles and harm low-income borrowers, older adults, and communities of color. SB 6289 would direct the Department of Commerce to create a statewide economic development and competitiveness strategic plan; Commerce, ports, and business groups supported the idea, while testifiers discussed the need for outreach, resources, and coordination. The committee also heard testimony on several gubernatorial appointments to the Gambling Commission and the Washington State Lottery, with appointees describing their backgrounds and commitment to public service.

Transcript Highlights:

• content.
• content.
• It says, knowing the character and content thereof, the content being a sexual performance of a child
• I'm here today to tell you you what very harmful content looks like.
• What's harder to understand is why this content is allowed to Texas children.

Bills: SB20, SB1621, SB412, SB441, SB442

Keywords: child protection, sexual offenses, visual material, artificial intelligence, criminal penalties, law enforcement, defense against prosecution, obscenity, judicial officer, deepfake, deep fake, synthetic media, AI-generated content, machine learning, nonconsensual pornography, revenge porn, sexually explicit media, intimate images, digital manipulation, visual depiction

Transcript Highlights:

• The tool must allow a user to assess whether content was created or altered by the covered provider's
• The bill also requires covered providers to include latent disclosures in AI-generated content and to
• offer users the option of including manifest disclosures in that content.
• All costs would be from the general fund.
• It limits them by requiring platforms show content that minor users have asked for, either by following

Bills: HB1170, HB1570, HB1834

Keywords: artificial intelligence, AI, generative AI, AI-generated content, deepfake, synthetic media, content provenance, provenance data, metadata, watermarking, disclosure, transparency, consumer protection, unfair or deceptive acts, unfair competition, Washington RCW, Title 19 RCW, platform regulation, AI detection tool, media authenticity

Summary: The House Appropriations Committee heard staff briefings and public testimony on several bills, beginning with Second Substitute House Bill 1170 on generative artificial intelligence. Staff explained that the bill would require certain large AI providers to offer provenance detection tools and include latent and optional manifest disclosures in AI-generated audio, image, video, or altered content, with enforcement by the Attorney General under the Consumer Protection Act. Fiscal staff said enforcement costs would depend heavily on industry compliance, with estimated costs ranging from tens of thousands to several hundred thousand dollars per year once enforcement begins in 2028. A technology industry representative testified in opposition, citing concerns about unclear enforcement language, definitions, and technical feasibility, while committee members asked about the bill’s scope and costs. The committee then heard House Bill 1570, as amended by a striking amendment, which would extend collective bargaining rights under the Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act to non-academic student employees at Western Washington University only, rather than at multiple regional institutions. Staff said the original bill would have cost about $1.5 million per biennium, while the narrowed amendment would likely reduce the fiscal impact to roughly $200,000 per biennium. Testimony from labor, student, and university-affiliated speakers supported the measure, emphasizing student worker safety, organizing efforts, and parity with bargaining rights already available at other public universities. Next, the committee received a briefing and testimony on Substitute House Bill 1833, which creates the Spark Act grant program in the Department of Commerce to support innovative uses of AI that provide a state benefit and share technology with the state. Staff said the program would require an FTE at Commerce and potentially grant awards, with a total estimated cost of about $660,000 to $1.6 million per fiscal year depending on appropriations and outside funding. Supporters described it as a way to promote AI innovation and economic development, while the sponsor said the bill reflects recommendations from the AI task force. Finally, the committee heard a briefing and extensive testimony on a proposed third substitute for House Bill 1834, which would prohibit addictive feeds and certain push notifications to minor users, while removing broader provisions that had applied to online services likely accessed by minors. Staff said the remaining enforcement costs for the Attorney General would likely continue at about $1.15 million this biennium, with other costs removed by the narrower substitute. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued the bill is needed to protect children from addictive platform design and related mental health harms, while opponents raised constitutional, privacy, parental-rights, and implementation concerns, including possible age-verification burdens and First Amendment issues. No votes were taken; the chair concluded public hearings and announced amendment deadlines and upcoming executive session schedules before adjournment.

Bills: SB82, SB1807, SB2254, HB119, HB130, HB581, HJR98, SB1988

Keywords: business liability, concealed carry, handgun policy, premises liability, criminal acts, civil liability, business premises, concealed handgun, property liability, property rights, gun regulations, criminal liability, protective order, confidentiality, personal information, court records, victim protection, charitable raffle, nonprofit, wildlife conservation

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met to consider several pending measures and adopted committee substitutes on multiple bills before voting them out. Senate Bill 2403, Senate Bill 1888 (jury wheel procedures in certain counties), Senate Bill 2417 (Attorney General actions under the Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act), Senate Bill 2459 (personal identifying information for judiciary employees), and Senate Bill 2943 (discrimination involving occupational licenses) were each reported favorably to the full Senate, with most passing unanimously and SB 2943 passing on a 10-1 vote. The committee also certified SB 1888, SB 2417, and SB 2459 for the local and uncontested calendars, and later did the same for SB 2943. The committee then considered House Joint Resolution 98, the Convention of States resolution, which was reported favorably to the full Senate on an 8-3 vote. House Bill 1393, dealing with daylight saving time and keeping the state on daylight saving time year-round, was also reported favorably, with the committee noting it heard the House bill rather than a Senate companion. House Bill 2884, concerning financial relationship disclosures for defense contractors, was likewise reported favorably, with the final tally announced as 11 ayes and 1 nay. No testimony was taken in the excerpt, and no substantive debate was recorded beyond brief clarifications about the bills and their companions. After completing the votes and calendar motions, the committee recessed.

Transcript Highlights:

• content is developed or modified by artificial intelligence.
• It requires the manifest disclosures to identify when content was AI modified instead of just AI generated
• If a tool can generate content, then the public should have a straightforward way to verify whether this
• It's user-friendly.
• The Attorney General is required to notify the Federal Attorney General and the Federal Inspector General

Bills: HB2186, HB2351, HB1170

Keywords: economic development, federal funds, state funding, infrastructure, grants, local government, emergency responders, emergency response, disaster response, obstruction of law enforcement, gross misdemeanor, public safety, incident command system, emergency operation zone, emergency management, law enforcement restrictions, warrant requirement, search and seizure, civil liberties, due process

Summary: The committee first took executive action on House Bill 1170, which concerns informing users when content is developed or modified by artificial intelligence and data provenance. Staff described a proposed second substitute and several amendments. The committee rejected amendments that would have included public entities and tribal nations in the covered-provider definition, added a technical and commercial feasibility standard, added geo-blocking language, and created a right to cure, while adopting amendments that allowed compliance through reasonably similar tools and provided a safe harbor for unintentional removal or alteration of disclosures. Members supporting the bill said it would promote transparency and consumer trust in AI-generated content; opponents argued the bill was premature, overly broad, and could hinder innovation. The committee then passed the amended bill out with a do-pass recommendation by a 7-4 vote, with two excused. The committee next opened a hearing on House Bill 2186, which would support the acquisition of federal funds for economic development by requiring Commerce to help applicants, expand the Fund Hub Washington website to all economic development grants, create a matching-funds account, and direct a study of available federal grants and matching needs. The prime sponsor and several testifiers from economic development groups, local government, and Commerce said the bill would help Washington capture more federal dollars, especially for underserved communities, broadband, maritime, workforce, and infrastructure projects. They emphasized that matching requirements often prevent smaller organizations and local governments from applying for grants and cited examples of potential federal funding that Washington is not fully accessing. Commerce testified that the bill aligns with efforts to improve federal grant competitiveness but noted fiscal impacts were still being developed. The final hearing was on House Bill 2351, which would protect emergency responders and emergency response operations. Staff explained that the bill would bar local governments and incident command systems from assisting in enforcement actions targeting emergency responders based on protected status, create emergency operation zones with restrictions on law enforcement activity, and change the obstruction statute to cover emergency responders. The prime sponsor and many local officials, firefighters, and advocates supported the bill, citing incidents where federal enforcement actions interfered with wildfire response and other emergencies, and arguing that coordination and life safety must come first. Some testifiers raised concerns about administrative burdens, possible conflicts with federal law, and the need for clearer language, including a possible mental-health defense and clarification of responder identification. No vote was taken on House Bill 2351 before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• That is why all of our members, general purpose AI tools, outlaw CSAM's generation.
• that could be generated.
• content that is right when you are.
• fake generator or does that matter? I mean it's a deep fake generator. Anybody who does.
• an explicit deepfake generator as opposed to a deepfake generator because they may be doing faking a

Bills: HB32, HB15, HB171, HB421, HB581, HB644, HB745, HB349, HB917, HB204, HB923, HB15, HB171, HB204

Keywords: eviction, landlord rights, tenant rights, justice court, property law, court procedures, chemical dependency, court-ordered treatment, mental health, health care, treatment facility, juvenile justice, criminal justice reform, deep fake, digital impersonation, age verification, private cause of action, explicit content, consumer protection, HB 581

Transcript Highlights:

• What is the, I guess, the base salary right now for a DA that's set under that general law?
• Each of those has generally less than 1% of practicing lawyers.
• I think we had something more general.
• General public. The same challenge exists in the medical field.
• That is generally the way that goes.

Bills: HB32, HB15, HB171, HB421, HB581, HB644, HB745, HB349, HB917, HB204, HB923, HB15, HB171, HB204

Keywords: eviction, landlord rights, tenant rights, justice court, property law, court procedures, chemical dependency, court-ordered treatment, mental health, health care, treatment facility, juvenile justice, criminal justice reform, deep fake, digital impersonation, age verification, private cause of action, explicit content, consumer protection, HB 581

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill aims to create a process that would allow users to report harmful content, ensuring that social
• users can report on social media platforms, ensuring that such content is clearly recognized and addressed
• I'm the general manager for... Pat Lanzan from Frisco and McKinney.
• So is that your store specifically or Petland in general?
• Petland in general has the pet for a lifetime.

Bills: HB74, HB175, HB460, HB576, HB2271, HB2294, HB2874, HB3016, HB3133, HB3191, HB3458, HB3929, HB4063, HB4115, HB4394, HB74, HB175

Keywords: Puerto Verde, Port Authority, eminent domain, bonds, tax assessments, economic development, infrastructure, transportation, public welfare, child care, certifications, Texas Rising Star Program, grant program, disability inclusion, family income, affordability, economic impact, state study, cost analysis, government support

Transcript Highlights:

• content.
• Platform must retain provenance metadata in compliant formats including where the content was generated
• This kind of information helps our users to make more informed decisions about the content they're engaging
• Informed users make stronger democracy.
• I would like to mention. that the risks of deepfakes and artificially generated contents are not theoretical

Bills: HB74, HB175, HB460, HB576, HB2271, HB2294, HB2874, HB3016, HB3133, HB3191, HB3458, HB3929, HB4063, HB4115, HB4394, HB74, HB175

Keywords: Puerto Verde, Port Authority, eminent domain, bonds, tax assessments, economic development, infrastructure, transportation, public welfare, child care, certifications, Texas Rising Star Program, grant program, disability inclusion, family income, affordability, economic impact, state study, cost analysis, government support

Transcript Highlights:

• out Senate Bill 2417, Senator King's bill about investigations and actions brought by the Attorney General

Bills: SB 18, SB 34, SB82, SB1807, SB2254, HB119, HB130, HB581, HJR98, SB1988

Keywords: Texas Water Code, TCEQ, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, water permit, water appropriation, dam permit exemption, reservoir, flood control, floodwater control, erosion control, sediment control, watershed protection, flood prevention, Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS, USDA, local sponsor, district, authority, water infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:

• The money was leveraged with our partners, private landowners, grants, and donors to generate over $24
• I'm here representing the Christian Life Commission of the Baptist General Convention.
• In that district, they did 24... ...million worth of sales, generating $5.9 million.
• Department of Health or the Attorney General.
• Currently, providers of websites or tools that use deepfake content do not have to verify that the user

Bills: SB82, SB1807, SB2254, HB119, HB130, HB581, HJR98, SB1988, SB 18, SB 34

Keywords: business liability, concealed carry, handgun policy, premises liability, criminal acts, civil liability, business premises, concealed handgun, property liability, property rights, gun regulations, criminal liability, protective order, confidentiality, personal information, court records, victim protection, charitable raffle, nonprofit, wildlife conservation

Bills: HB 207, HB 235, HB 324, HB 449, HB 463, HB 502, HB 1121, HB 1445, HB 1465, HB 1778, HB 1977, HB 2000, HB 2066, HB 2596

Keywords: child protection, sexual offenses, obscenity laws, visual material, anatomically correct dolls, mannequins, robots, criminal offenses, sexually explicit material, minors, artificial intelligence, sexually explicit, doll, mannequin, robot, law enforcement, healthcare, insurance, affordable care, access

Bills: HB 207, HB 235, HB 324, HB 449, HB 463, HB 502, HB 1121, HB 1445, HB 1465, HB 1778, HB 1977, HB 2000, HB 2066, HB 2596

Keywords: child protection, sexual offenses, obscenity laws, visual material, anatomically correct dolls, mannequins, robots, criminal offenses, sexually explicit material, minors, artificial intelligence, sexually explicit, doll, mannequin, robot, law enforcement, healthcare, insurance, affordable care, access

Transcript Highlights:

• , and does not apply to products, services, websites, or applications that exclusively provide non-user-generated
• It, it, Does not apply to content that is generated as a result of interactive experiences.
• It said that it should say, 'This subsection does not apply to text content that is generated as a result
• users.
• opts in, and so 'user' is undefined.

Bills: SB1786

Keywords: artificial intelligence, content verification, provenance data, transparency, digital content, 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• video content as a minor to request the content creator to delete or edit the video content to remove
• The content requirements do not impose a liability on the online hosting platform for content that is
• created by a third party or require proactive monitoring of user-generated content.
• If that content creator refuses to remove the content from the platform, there's then created a civil
• So the way that the content is monetized is that all of the money generated from either views from the

Bills: HB2010, HB2192, HB2310, HB2501

Keywords: digital goods, advertising, ownership, license, consumer protection, refund policies, streaming services, minors, content creators, online platforms, compensation, trust accounts, child protection, video content, privacy, employment, independent contractor, marketplace, digital services, contractual agreements

Transcript Highlights:

• The costs are generally split between the parties for arbitration.
• However, it does not explicitly address AI-generated content, leaving Washingtonians vulnerable to identity
• I personally know a student who was impacted by this technology when someone generated explicit content
• However, it does not explicitly address AI-generated content, leaving Washingtonians vulnerable to identity
• I personally know a student who was impacted by this technology when someone generated explicit content

Bills: SB6239, SB6074, SB5886, SB6041, SB6190

Keywords: tort claims, state liability, Washington law, government accountability, legal process, parole, criminal justice reform, felony, recidivism, rehabilitation, public safety, personality rights, right of publicity, publicity rights, name image likeness, NIL, deepfake, AI-generated content, digital impersonation, forged digital likeness

Summary: The committee heard staff briefing and public testimony on Senate Bill 6239, which would require civil arbitration for tort claims against the state and its subdivisions before trial. Supporters, including county executives, county commissioners, school district and risk pool representatives, cities, sheriffs, and other local government groups, said rising liability and insurance costs are straining budgets and threatening core services. They argued arbitration could encourage earlier resolution, reduce litigation costs, preserve jury trial rights through trial de novo, and help address what they described as Washington’s unusually broad liability exposure. Some supporters also asked that any amendments not narrow the bill’s scope. Opponents, including trial lawyers, legal aid advocates, survivors of abuse, journalists, and victim-rights organizations, said the bill would create barriers to justice, delay accountability, and reduce transparency by moving claims into a private process. They emphasized that the bill would affect not only abuse claims but also employment, discrimination, and other civil claims against public entities, and warned it could retraumatize survivors and impose added costs on low-income claimants. Several witnesses said the state should instead improve oversight and address root causes of claims. The chair noted the bill would be amended before further action, and the committee closed public hearing after hearing testimony from 16 pro, 723 con, and 4 other sign-ins. The committee then took up Senate Bill 6074, which would reinstitute a parole process for certain felony offenders sentenced on or after July 1, 2027, allowing petitions to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board after 60% of total confinement is served, with exclusions for certain serious offenses. Supporters of the bill, including people with lived experience, reentry advocates, and some criminal justice organizations, said parole could recognize rehabilitation, improve public safety, and make better use of public resources. Others supported the concept but raised concerns about the bill’s prospective-only application, the 60% threshold, racial disparities, and how parole would interact with existing sentencing, work release, and reentry laws. Prosecutors said they were open to discussing parole but thought the bill was not yet ready and would require more work on eligibility standards, implementation, and resources.

Transcript Highlights:

• content.
• In general. I get it.
• The 33 and a third percent of content is important because those are for adult content websites.
• Adult content is adult content.
• content creates serious privacy risks for all users and places the responsibility in the wrong hands

Bills: HB2112

Keywords: age restrictions, online content, digital media, youth protection, cyber safety, 904, all

Summary: The Consumer Protection and Business Committee held a public hearing on House Bill 2112, which would require age verification for websites and other commercial online entities that knowingly distribute material deemed harmful to minors, along with landing-page and ad notices about youth health risks. Staff explained the bill’s scope, exemptions for bona fide news/public-interest content and for ISPs/search engines/cloud providers, and enforcement by the Attorney General with civil penalties. The prime sponsor, Rep. Mari Leavitt, said the bill is intended to protect children from harmful online sexual content and argued that parental controls alone are insufficient; she emphasized privacy safeguards, the use of third-party verification, and cited court decisions and other states’ laws as support. Supportive witnesses, including a parent who described her son’s suicide after exposure to harmful online content, clinicians, and other advocates, said the bill is needed because children can easily bypass simple age gates and that the harms include depression, addiction, and other mental health impacts. Several witnesses and committee members discussed how age verification could work, including privacy-preserving methods, facial age estimation, zero-knowledge proofs, and tokenized checks. Supporters said the bill is narrowly aimed at adult-content sites and that adults’ access would remain protected, while some members asked about search engines, gaming platforms, AI chatbots, and whether the bill should be broader or more precise. Questions also focused on data retention, third-party vendors, and whether the bill’s warning-label and one-third-content thresholds were sufficiently clear. Opponents argued the bill would create privacy and security risks, could be difficult to enforce against out-of-state or foreign websites, and might push users toward less regulated sites. Civil liberties, tech, and LGBTQ advocacy groups warned that the definition of “sexual material harmful to minors” is vague and could sweep in sexual health, educational, reproductive health, and LGBTQ-related content, while also chilling speech and burdening lawful adult access. Some opponents said parental controls and better platform design are preferable alternatives. No vote or executive action was taken; the hearing was limited to testimony and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• For general administrative costs, For general administrative costs, Commerce assumes they would require
• content that tracks its origin.
• This bill mirrors work that has been done in other states on informing users when content is developed
• It is This bill mirrors work that has been done in other states on informing users when content is developed
• because it exposes those users.

Bills: HB2073, HB2403, HB2587, HB2607, HB1170, HB1570, HB1710, HB1750, HB1834, HB2441

Keywords: health insurance, premium assistance, funding, healthcare, subsidies, failure to register, criminal justice, registration requirements, public safety, law enforcement, nonprofit, grant funding, pilot program, financial support, community development, child care, childcare, subsidy rates, rate regions, market rate survey

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2073, which would require nonprofit health carriers with surplus above 600% of risk-based capital to pay 3% of the excess to support the Cascade Care Savings premium assistance account. Committee staff said the bill could generate about $80 million in FY 2027, while OIC costs would cover rulemaking and hearings. Supporters argued the bill would redirect excess consumer premium dollars to help people afford coverage, while opponents from nonprofit health plans and business groups said the reserves are needed for claims, market stability, and to weather downturns, and warned the bill could raise costs or destabilize coverage. The bill then moved to public hearing only, with no action taken. The committee also heard Second Substitute House Bill 2132, which limits disclosure and retention of personally identifying and financial information in WASFA applications. Staff explained the bill would exempt WASFA records from public disclosure, restrict sharing except for limited purposes, and shorten retention to one year after the award year, but could create significant purge and systems costs for WSAC and colleges. The sponsor and student advocates said the measure is needed to protect student privacy and encourage aid applications, especially for vulnerable and undocumented students. No opposition was heard, and the bill remained in hearing. House Bill 2403, which reduces the penalty for failure to register as a sex offender, adds community custody and DOC support, and requires a review of registration policies, drew testimony in strong support. Staff said the bill would produce DOC savings and modest one-time costs for court and law-enforcement updates. Testifiers said the measure had broad consensus among criminal justice stakeholders and would better address the practical reasons people fail to register. The committee also heard House Bill 2587, creating a Commerce pilot to provide advance grant funds to eligible nonprofits, and House Bill 2607, which would periodically rebase child care subsidy rate regions; both drew support from nonprofit and child care providers, with staff describing indeterminate or moderate fiscal impacts. In executive session, the committee considered several amendments and then advanced multiple bills. For Second Substitute House Bill 1170 on generative AI disclosures, all proposed amendments were rejected, and the bill passed the committee 18-9. Substitute House Bill 1570, limited by amendment to Western Washington University student employees, also passed. Proposed Third Substitute House Bill 1710, which creates a state preclearance process under the Voting Rights Act for certain jurisdictions with prior voting-rights violations, had one fiscal amendment adopted and then passed. The committee also received amendment briefings on House Bills 1750, 1833, and 1834, but the transcript ends before final action on those measures.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now the content is hosted and spread online, and user data of the adult or child user is the transaction
• Now the content is hosted and spread online, and user data of the adult or child user is the transaction
• transgender content.
• general.
• Nutified AI generated content<01:31:19.760><c> today</c><01:31:20.080><c> is</c><01:31:20.320><c> the

Bills: HF357, HF3389, HF1434, HF2500, HF1606

Keywords: HF357, hasenpfeffer, card games, social skill game, Minnesota gambling law, tournament, contest, prize limit, low-stakes gaming, card game exemption, gambling exemption, cribbage, bridge, euchre, pinochle, Texas hold'em, whist, skat, sheepshead, gin