Video & Transcript : 'transcript notation' :

Page 1 of 79
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Jan 20th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Early Learning & K-12 Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • But we had to get the transcripts every year.
  • And I would assume it goes without saying that the competency-based transcript or performance transcript
  • We know that low-income students... ...to these transcripts is vastly important.
  • If it's a digital transcript, then that could be edited pretty quickly.
  • This bill provides a statewide standard for digital transcript flow and the exchange of transcripts among
Bills: SB6052 , SB6051 , SB5907 , SB5860 , SB5574
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Feb 3rd, 2026 at 08:00 am

Early Learning & K-12 Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • of Washington's educational service districts to develop... ...and maintain a statewide digital transcript
  • file standard and a secure platform-independent environment for the two-way exchange of transcript data
  • We now have Senate Bill 6052 before us, the digital school transcripts. I move that...
  • Oh, excuse me. ...before us, the digital school transcripts.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Finance May 13th, 2026

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • And what this bill does is it amends and updates the fee schedule for certain transcripts at the 19th
  • What do we pay currently in the 19th JDC for, let's say for civil cases for a transcript? Okay.
  • And I'll, I mean, full disclosure, I think what we charge for transcripts, and I think the way that we
  • know, I think it's a due process challenge in a lot of cases because of the expense of getting a transcript
Bills: HB27 , HB143 , HB205 , HB308 , HB311 , HB417 , HB430 , HB562 , HB812 , HB1129
Committee: Senate Finance
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Education Policy - 03/18/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Article 1, Section 9, beginning on line 9.14, requires that expulsion hearing transcripts be made available
  • to all parties upon appeal of an expulsion decision, and that these complete hearing transcripts must
  • include a written transcript.
  • This change is meant to address a problem of inconsistency in quality of audio-visual hearing transcripts
Bills: HF3714 , HF4399 , HF4176 , HF2544 , HF60 , HF4231 , HF4232
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Education Policy Committee Mar 18th, 2026

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • and just try to figure out uh transcript and just try to figure out uh where<00:18:47.440><c> a</c><
  • </c><00:19:05.280><c> and</c> graders make D's on the transcript and graders make D's on the transcript
  • ,</c><00:19:06.720><c> it</c><00:19:06.880><c> sticks</c> when a D hit the transcript, it sticks when
  • a D hit the transcript, it sticks to<00:19:07.280><c> the</c><00:19:07.360><c> transcript</c><00:19:
  • Representative Daniels. transcripts, this is where this student transcripts, this is where this student
Bills: HF3714 , HF4399 , HF4176 , HF2544 , HF60 , HF4231 , HF4232
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Ways & Means Feb 9th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 6052 establishes a statewide digital transcript data sharing environment.
  • Senate Bill 6052 establishes a statewide digital transcript data sharing environment.
  • Senate Bill 6052, establishing a statewide digital transcript data sharing environment, I move that Senate
  • Senate Bill 6052, establishing a statewide digital transcript data sharing environment, be moved without
Committee: Senate Ways & Means
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 9th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • a transcript, that would be at that lower rate.
  • So the transcript is not transcribed until there's a request.
  • So they'll say, I want a copy of the transcript. All right.
  • They don't charge for the same transcript multiple times.
  • And so that transcript requires a certified court reporter, who would then certify So that transcript
Committee: House Judiciary
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><01:24:57.760><c> and</c> or not we we can make a notation and or not we we can make a notation and
  • </c><02:35:25.680><c> of</c> we also want to take the notation of we also want to take the notation of
  • </c><02:35:41.800><c> that</c> counties equitably so we'll notate that counties equitably so we'll notate
  • [No audible content beyond a transcription artifact.]
  • [No audible content beyond a transcription artifact.]
Summary: The joint House Agriculture and Food Systems and Tourism hearing focused on HB 189 and HB 966, both dealing with agricultural tourism. HB 189 would require counties to adopt ordinances governing review and permitting of agricultural tourism as secondary uses on working farms, require the principal agricultural use to pre-exist any tourism-related permit, and limit ag tourism to land where productive agriculture is occurring. HB 966 would create statewide uniform standards for agricultural tourism, require county registration of activities, require ag tourism to coexist with agricultural activity on a farming operation, and end the tourism use when agricultural activity ceases. Testimony on HB 189 was mixed. The Department of Agriculture and Kualoa Ranch opposed the bill, arguing that the proposed restrictions and income-based limits could burden bona fide farms and ranches, reduce flexibility for counties, and harm food production, jobs, and diversification efforts. Kualoa Ranch said ag tourism supports its food sales and community market and warned the bill could cost more than 350 jobs. The Hawaiʻi Cattlemen’s Council also opposed the measure for similar reasons. The Hawaiʻi Farmers Union supported the bill with suggested amendments, including clearer language around agricultural dedication. The Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau supported the intent of the bill but urged caution, saying ag tourism should remain tied to actual agricultural production and that counties need flexibility to address abuses without imposing overly rigid standards. Members discussed how to define a bona fide agricultural operation and whether property tax agricultural dedication could serve as a clearer qualifier. They also raised concerns about how counties would enforce revenue thresholds or separate accounting for tourism and farm income, and whether state law should better target clearly non-agricultural uses such as gondolas or other abusive developments. The Department of Agriculture and Farm Bureau said counties already have authority to regulate ag tourism through ordinances, but that any new standards should avoid unintended burdens on true farmers and ranchers. HB 966 was then introduced, and initial testimony again reflected support for the bill’s intent from some agricultural groups and opposition or caution from others. Kualoa Ranch said ag tourism can help educate visitors and support agriculture, the Hawaiʻi Farmers Union supported county flexibility, and the Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau reiterated concerns about the bill’s income comparison provisions and the need to distinguish legitimate agricultural tourism from misuse. No votes were taken during the hearing.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

AGR Public Hearing - Fri Mar 14, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST

Agriculture & Food Systems

Transcript Highlights:
  • [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
  • artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
  • artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
  • artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
  • artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription artifact] [inaudible / transcription
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (02/27/2025)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • [Unintelligible / no substantive transcript text.]
  • [Unintelligible / no substantive transcript text.]
  • [Unintelligible / no substantive transcript text.]
  • [Unintelligible / no substantive transcript text.]
  • [Unintelligible / no substantive transcript text.]
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • work for the corporation commission, they can go to a county, and they can potentially have more transcripts
  • I just Lot of additional opportunities for income for outside parties requesting transcripts.
  • So if you look into it and determine There's no investigation needed, you're not going to notate it.
  • But I think that if anybody was investigated, you want to have an affirmative notation that that particular
  • So if they want a notation, I think it gives you the option if they want a notation that there is no