Transcript Highlights:

• The tool must allow a user to assess whether content was created or altered by the covered provider's
• offer users the option of including manifest disclosures in that content.
• Let's see, it applies to images, image, video, or audio content. Thank you for clarifying.
• This bill is not about restricting content or speech.
• Without personalization, apps struggle to deliver relevant content.

Bills: HB1170, HB1570, HB1834

Keywords: artificial intelligence, AI, generative AI, AI-generated content, deepfake, synthetic media, content provenance, provenance data, metadata, watermarking, disclosure, transparency, consumer protection, unfair or deceptive acts, unfair competition, Washington RCW, Title 19 RCW, platform regulation, AI detection tool, media authenticity

Summary: The House Appropriations Committee heard staff briefings and public testimony on several bills, beginning with Second Substitute House Bill 1170 on generative artificial intelligence. Staff explained that the bill would require certain large AI providers to offer provenance detection tools and include latent and optional manifest disclosures in AI-generated audio, image, video, or altered content, with enforcement by the Attorney General under the Consumer Protection Act. Fiscal staff said enforcement costs would depend heavily on industry compliance, with estimated costs ranging from tens of thousands to several hundred thousand dollars per year once enforcement begins in 2028. A technology industry representative testified in opposition, citing concerns about unclear enforcement language, definitions, and technical feasibility, while committee members asked about the bill’s scope and costs. The committee then heard House Bill 1570, as amended by a striking amendment, which would extend collective bargaining rights under the Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act to non-academic student employees at Western Washington University only, rather than at multiple regional institutions. Staff said the original bill would have cost about $1.5 million per biennium, while the narrowed amendment would likely reduce the fiscal impact to roughly $200,000 per biennium. Testimony from labor, student, and university-affiliated speakers supported the measure, emphasizing student worker safety, organizing efforts, and parity with bargaining rights already available at other public universities. Next, the committee received a briefing and testimony on Substitute House Bill 1833, which creates the Spark Act grant program in the Department of Commerce to support innovative uses of AI that provide a state benefit and share technology with the state. Staff said the program would require an FTE at Commerce and potentially grant awards, with a total estimated cost of about $660,000 to $1.6 million per fiscal year depending on appropriations and outside funding. Supporters described it as a way to promote AI innovation and economic development, while the sponsor said the bill reflects recommendations from the AI task force. Finally, the committee heard a briefing and extensive testimony on a proposed third substitute for House Bill 1834, which would prohibit addictive feeds and certain push notifications to minor users, while removing broader provisions that had applied to online services likely accessed by minors. Staff said the remaining enforcement costs for the Attorney General would likely continue at about $1.15 million this biennium, with other costs removed by the narrower substitute. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued the bill is needed to protect children from addictive platform design and related mental health harms, while opponents raised constitutional, privacy, parental-rights, and implementation concerns, including possible age-verification burdens and First Amendment issues. No votes were taken; the chair concluded public hearings and announced amendment deadlines and upcoming executive session schedules before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• It says, knowing the character and content thereof, the content being a sexual performance of a child
• You would have bookstores that would have to police teenagers and second-guess what content is within
• In case you didn't know it, there's very harmful content in school libraries all across Texas.
• I'm here today to tell you you what very harmful content looks like.
• What's harder to understand is why this content is allowed to Texas children.

Bills: SB20, SB1621, SB412, SB441, SB442

Keywords: child protection, sexual offenses, visual material, artificial intelligence, criminal penalties, law enforcement, defense against prosecution, obscenity, judicial officer, deepfake, deep fake, synthetic media, AI-generated content, machine learning, nonconsensual pornography, revenge porn, sexually explicit media, intimate images, digital manipulation, visual depiction

Transcript Highlights:

• Minor edits that do not significantly alter the content are exempt from this requirement.
• Finally, if the content involves an identifiable individual or relevant identifying information, that
• , dated 3/25/26 at 11:29 a.m., includes that covered providers, when including provenance data in content
• have this marker so that that is the intention. image or audio content have this marker so that that
• It, it, Does not apply to content that is generated as a result of interactive experiences.

Bills: SB1786

Keywords: artificial intelligence, content verification, provenance data, transparency, digital content, 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Deepfake material is defined as visual content created to deceive, depicting a real person performing
• This bill aims to create a process that would allow users to report harmful content, ensuring that social
• media platforms take responsibility for the content creators' actions.
• If the content is found to be explicit deepfake material, the platform must remove it and take steps
• Ensuring that social media platforms are held accountable for their content management.

Bills: HB74, HB175, HB460, HB576, HB2271, HB2294, HB2874, HB3016, HB3133, HB3191, HB3458, HB3929, HB4063, HB4115, HB4394, HB74, HB175

Keywords: Puerto Verde, Port Authority, eminent domain, bonds, tax assessments, economic development, infrastructure, transportation, public welfare, child care, certifications, Texas Rising Star Program, grant program, disability inclusion, family income, affordability, economic impact, state study, cost analysis, government support

Transcript Highlights:

• Today, that decision-making is increasingly relies on digital content shared by artificial intelligence
• to audio images, video, or document to increasing transparency without moderating content or limiting
• Platform must retain provenance metadata in compliant formats including where the content was generated
• I respectfully urge your support for this Social Media Content Transparency Act. to help Texas lead in
• By creating content and provenance data, you get to see where it's coming from, and it's part of what

Bills: HB74, HB175, HB460, HB576, HB2271, HB2294, HB2874, HB3016, HB3133, HB3191, HB3458, HB3929, HB4063, HB4115, HB4394, HB74, HB175

Keywords: Puerto Verde, Port Authority, eminent domain, bonds, tax assessments, economic development, infrastructure, transportation, public welfare, child care, certifications, Texas Rising Star Program, grant program, disability inclusion, family income, affordability, economic impact, state study, cost analysis, government support

Transcript Highlights:

• That was one side that was trying to prevent minors from seeing this content.
• the same way that we're treating physical adult content and this adult content the same way that we're
• treating physical adult content and this is the scenario I've discussed with different stakeholders
• It protects the children from seeing the content.
• This time we're protecting children from being in the content or non-consensual people.

Bills: HB2133, HB2592

Keywords: sexual material, consent, synthetic depiction, privacy, internet regulation, rights protection, artificial intelligence, government regulation, innovation, procurement, administrative burdens, 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• A content creator who features a minor who is eligible for compensation in their video content must maintain
• video content as a minor to request the content creator to delete or edit the video content to remove
• The content requirements do not impose a liability on the online hosting platform for content that is
• If that content creator refuses to remove the content from the platform, there's then created a civil
• And then under this bill, the platform itself would be required to take down that content if the content

Bills: HB2010, HB2192, HB2310, HB2501

Keywords: digital goods, advertising, ownership, license, consumer protection, refund policies, streaming services, minors, content creators, online platforms, compensation, trust accounts, child protection, video content, privacy, employment, independent contractor, marketplace, digital services, contractual agreements

Transcript Highlights:

• The second, pool 182 provides a definition of image content to mean images that are submitted to the
• This would clarify language surrounding image content.
• This bill forces companies to provide a public tool to detect AI content.
• This bill mandates that companies use provenance detection tools to flag AI content starting in 2027.
• The bill does not address content at all.

Bills: HB2073, HB2403, HB2587, HB2607, HB1170, HB1570, HB1710, HB1750, HB1834, HB2441

Keywords: health insurance, premium assistance, funding, healthcare, subsidies, failure to register, criminal justice, registration requirements, public safety, law enforcement, nonprofit, grant funding, pilot program, financial support, community development, child care, childcare, subsidy rates, rate regions, market rate survey

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2073, which would require nonprofit health carriers with surplus above 600% of risk-based capital to pay 3% of the excess to support the Cascade Care Savings premium assistance account. Committee staff said the bill could generate about $80 million in FY 2027, while OIC costs would cover rulemaking and hearings. Supporters argued the bill would redirect excess consumer premium dollars to help people afford coverage, while opponents from nonprofit health plans and business groups said the reserves are needed for claims, market stability, and to weather downturns, and warned the bill could raise costs or destabilize coverage. The bill then moved to public hearing only, with no action taken. The committee also heard Second Substitute House Bill 2132, which limits disclosure and retention of personally identifying and financial information in WASFA applications. Staff explained the bill would exempt WASFA records from public disclosure, restrict sharing except for limited purposes, and shorten retention to one year after the award year, but could create significant purge and systems costs for WSAC and colleges. The sponsor and student advocates said the measure is needed to protect student privacy and encourage aid applications, especially for vulnerable and undocumented students. No opposition was heard, and the bill remained in hearing. House Bill 2403, which reduces the penalty for failure to register as a sex offender, adds community custody and DOC support, and requires a review of registration policies, drew testimony in strong support. Staff said the bill would produce DOC savings and modest one-time costs for court and law-enforcement updates. Testifiers said the measure had broad consensus among criminal justice stakeholders and would better address the practical reasons people fail to register. The committee also heard House Bill 2587, creating a Commerce pilot to provide advance grant funds to eligible nonprofits, and House Bill 2607, which would periodically rebase child care subsidy rate regions; both drew support from nonprofit and child care providers, with staff describing indeterminate or moderate fiscal impacts. In executive session, the committee considered several amendments and then advanced multiple bills. For Second Substitute House Bill 1170 on generative AI disclosures, all proposed amendments were rejected, and the bill passed the committee 18-9. Substitute House Bill 1570, limited by amendment to Western Washington University student employees, also passed. Proposed Third Substitute House Bill 1710, which creates a state preclearance process under the Voting Rights Act for certain jurisdictions with prior voting-rights violations, had one fiscal amendment adopted and then passed. The committee also received amendment briefings on House Bills 1750, 1833, and 1834, but the transcript ends before final action on those measures.

Transcript Highlights:

• sexually explicit conduct instead of measures to prevent a chatbot from producing sexually explicit content
• Requires an operator to implement reasonable measures. ...content or suggestive dialogue with minors.
• It requires an operator's protocols to include reasonable measures to prevent the generation of content
• It requires an operator's protocols to include reasonable measures to prevent the generation of content
• We want to make sure, I mean, there's a lot of good content in the substitute that was proposed on our

Bills: HB2397, HB2417, HB2157, HB2186, HB2225, HB2351

Keywords: fire services, reimbursement, state agencies, local jurisdictions, mobilization plan, military justice, victims' rights, militia, Washington code, legal protections, artificial intelligence, AI regulation, algorithmic discrimination, high-risk AI, machine learning, generative AI, synthetic content, impact assessment, risk management policy, consumer protection

Summary: The committee met on Friday, January 23rd, with executive session items and two public hearings, and first reviewed several bills in executive session. House Bill 2225, regulating AI companion chatbots, was briefed with two competing proposed substitutes and an amendment limiting enforcement to actions brought by the Attorney General. After discussion, the committee rejected the amendment and adopted the Thomas substitute, then voted 7-3 to report the bill out with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 2186, supporting acquisition of federal funds for economic development, was also considered with a substitute that narrowed Commerce’s duties unless there is a specific appropriation and adjusted timing and matching-fund provisions; it was reported out unanimously with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 2351 and House Bill 2157 were also briefed in executive session, but no final action was taken on them during the meeting. The first public hearing was on House Bill 2397, which would require more timely reimbursement to state agencies and local jurisdictions mobilized under the Washington State Fire Services mobilization plan. Testimony from fire officials and a finance manager described reimbursement delays of six to ten months, the strain on local budgets and reserves, and the risk that departments may stop participating in wildland deployments. Witnesses supported the bill but suggested technical refinements, including clarifying when the 60-day reimbursement clock starts and noting that staffing may be needed to meet the timeline. No one testified in opposition. The second public hearing was on House Bill 2417, which would add victim-rights protections to the Washington Code of Military Justice, aligning state military justice procedures with the federal Uniform Code of Military Justice. The prime sponsor and military legal witnesses explained that the bill would ensure consistent notice, participation, and fairness protections for victims when Guard members are serving under state authority, especially in Title 32 status. A veterans coalition also supported the measure, saying it closes an important gap and improves trust and accountability. No testimony was offered in opposition, and the bill was scheduled for future executive session.

Transcript Highlights:

• Guards are pornographic content.
• It simply requires with adult content.
• </c><00:48:00.319><c> that</c> young people from accessing content that young people from accessing content
• </c> against content against content that<00:48:56.480><c> is</c><00:48:56.720><c> designed</c><00:48
• </c> ban allows predators to create content ban allows predators to create content in<01:46:23.520><c

Bills: HF357, HF3389, HF1434, HF2500, HF1606

Keywords: HF357, hasenpfeffer, card games, social skill game, Minnesota gambling law, tournament, contest, prize limit, low-stakes gaming, card game exemption, gambling exemption, cribbage, bridge, euchre, pinochle, Texas hold'em, whist, skat, sheepshead, gin

Transcript Highlights:

• For background, two weeks ago, this committee held a work session on the regulation of social media content
• This committee held a work session on the regulation of social media content for children and considered
• Evidence is mounting that social media can expose children to harmful content online.
• Thank you. extreme content to minors.
• I'm speaking to the portion of the bill that addresses the type of content shown to minors.

Bills: SB5976, SB6111, SB6250, SB6257, SB6289, SGA9060, SGA9169, SGA9265, SGA9266

Keywords: commercial email, spam regulations, online marketing, privacy, consumer protection, SB 6111, Washington Protecting Children Online Act, online child safety, minor privacy, age verification, parental consent, social media regulation, digital platforms, user-generated content, content moderation, online harms, youth protection, data privacy, geolocation, targeted advertising

Summary: The committee heard briefings, sponsor remarks, and public testimony on several bills. SB 5976 would amend the Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act by requiring a more reliable basis for knowing an email is sent to a Washington resident, narrowing subject-line liability to misleading statements material to a transaction, and limiting damages and Consumer Protection Act claims unless a recipient received, reviewed, and detrimentally relied on the email. Supporters, including retailers, e-commerce groups, hospitality businesses, and business associations, said the current law has led to a wave of class-action litigation over routine marketing emails; opponents argued the bill would weaken consumer protections against deceptive marketing. No vote was taken. SB 6111 would require age verification for certain social media accounts, parental consent for known minors, restrictions on use of minors’ data, and Attorney General enforcement, with a limited private right of action for parents or guardians. The sponsor and supporters, including PTA, parents, and mental health advocates, said the bill is needed to reduce minors’ exposure to harmful content and to give parents more control. Opponents from technology and privacy groups raised constitutional concerns, data-security issues, and uncertainty about how platforms would verify parental consent. No vote was taken. SB 6257 would allow trainee real estate appraiser license timelines to be tolled for documented illness, similar to existing tolling for military service. SB 6250 would raise the maximum principal amount for small loans from $700 to $1,200, with future inflation adjustments; the sponsor and Moneytree said the limit should reflect inflation and still preserve existing safeguards, while consumer, labor, housing, and anti-poverty advocates warned it would deepen debt cycles and harm low-income borrowers, older adults, and communities of color. SB 6289 would direct the Department of Commerce to create a statewide economic development and competitiveness strategic plan; Commerce, ports, and business groups supported the idea, while testifiers discussed the need for outreach, resources, and coordination. The committee also heard testimony on several gubernatorial appointments to the Gambling Commission and the Washington State Lottery, with appointees describing their backgrounds and commitment to public service.

Transcript Highlights:

• It protects privacy and dignity of individuals from non-consensual synthetic sexual materials.
• But overall, that's what it does. from non-consensual synthetic sexual from non-consensual synthetic
• sexual material using AI synthetic sexual material using AI against<00:10:45.519><c> children</c><00
• ,</c><00:19:40.559><c> it's</c> exist like this extreme content, it's exist like this extreme content
• </c> distribution of non-consensual synthetic distribution of non-consensual synthetic sexual<00:21:47.919

Bills: HB0083, HB0102, HB0178

Keywords: subpoena, legislative authority, penalty, compliance, law enforcement, artificial intelligence, synthetic sexual material, child protection, self-harm, criminal liability, public employment, labor organization, dues withdrawal, collective bargaining, public funding, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This will come up later in a specific policy and is an area of some contention, but I think we’ve threaded
• specific policy and is an area<00:53:41.839><c> of</c><00:53:42.000><c> some</c><00:53:42.240><c> contention
• </c><00:53:42.960><c> but</c><00:53:43.200><c> I</c><00:53:43.359><c> think</c> area of some contention
• but I think area of some contention but I think we've<00:53:43.680><c> threaded</c><00:53:44.000><c>

Bills: HB0076, HB0102, HB0115

Keywords: annexation, landowner rights, municipal law, city planning, property, local government, artificial intelligence, synthetic sexual material, child protection, self-harm, criminal liability, cardiac emergency, defibrillator, school safety, training, public health, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:19:19.760><c> Synthetic</c> exploitation statutes. Synthetic exploitation statutes.
• On the distribution of non-synthetic images provisions, we want to make sure that all synthetic images
• </c><00:37:15.440><c> images</c> the distribution of non synthetic images the distribution of non synthetic
• </c><00:37:37.760><c> material,</c> definition of synthetic sexual material, definition of synthetic
• </c> defined in 47 USC153 for content defined in 47 USC153 for content provided<00:44:10.720><c> by</

Bills: HB0076, HB0102, HB0115

Keywords: annexation, landowner rights, municipal law, city planning, property, local government, artificial intelligence, synthetic sexual material, child protection, self-harm, criminal liability, cardiac emergency, defibrillator, school safety, training, public health, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It modifies the required contents of the report that's supposed to be submitted with the plan, such that
• It modifies the required contents of the report that's supposed to be submitted with the plan, such that
• the report, the required contents of the report that's supposed to be submitted with the plan, such

Bills: HB2157, HB2351, HB2365, HB2357, HB2446, HB2523, HB2606

Keywords: artificial intelligence, AI regulation, algorithmic discrimination, high-risk AI, machine learning, generative AI, synthetic content, impact assessment, risk management policy, consumer protection, civil rights, discrimination, facial recognition, automated decision-making, deployers, developers, Washington RCW, Title 19 RCW, employment, housing

Summary: The Technology, Economic Development, and Veterans Committee met on January 27, first in executive session and later for public hearings. In executive session, the committee considered House Bills 2157 (high-risk AI systems), 2351 (protecting emergency responders and emergency response operations), 2365 (digital equity), 2357 (establishing the Washington Division of Civil Air Patrol), and 2446 (developing the quantum technology industry). Staff briefed proposed substitutes and amendments for each bill. The committee adopted amendments to HB 2157 exempting activities regulated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act and covered entities under HIPAA, and then advanced the bill. HB 2351 and HB 2365 also advanced after debate and amendment votes; several definition-related amendments to HB 2365 were adopted, while others, including a data-sharing amendment and a rural-area amendment, were rejected. HB 2357 passed without amendment, and HB 2446 advanced after adoption of an amendment extending the strategy deadline, broadening eligible contractors, and making a technical correction. The committee then held a public hearing on House Bill 2523, which would make the community reinvestment program ongoing, require periodic updates and reporting, and direct a study of fund distribution and use. Testifiers from workforce boards, tribal programs, reentry services, community organizations, and Commerce described successful uses of the program for job training, reentry, small business support, and economic mobility, and urged continued investment. Some witnesses suggested technical changes, including stronger accountability and clearer reporting. Commerce staff said the program had reached many organizations and people and supported the bill with technical recommendations. A second public hearing was held on House Bill 2606, which would update the Office of Privacy and Data Protection’s duties and performance measures in response to a JLARC audit. The bill would remove certain reporting requirements, add measures tied to privacy training, public contacts, staff education, and privacy assessments, and expand the office’s duties to include review of agency AI projects. The prime sponsor and the state chief privacy officer both said the bill aligns the office’s statute with its current capacity and JLARC’s recommendations, and the hearing concluded with no further committee action before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• If it stops a 12. year old girl from being bullied because they had created sexual content about her.
• Anybody under the age of 60 for creating sexually explicit content.
• Three, we verify. that if you're gonna create sexually explicit content that you're not creating it on
• So even if there is content that doesn't involve a child, but it involves an adult, that is also outlawed
• In there, as I've already said, we also don't create, you know, any type of sexually explicit content

Bills: HB32, HB15, HB171, HB421, HB581, HB644, HB745, HB349, HB917, HB204, HB923, HB15, HB171, HB204

Keywords: eviction, landlord rights, tenant rights, justice court, property law, court procedures, chemical dependency, court-ordered treatment, mental health, health care, treatment facility, juvenile justice, criminal justice reform, deep fake, digital impersonation, age verification, private cause of action, explicit content, consumer protection, HB 581

Transcript Highlights:

• On the panel, we ensure that the format and content is appropriate, given the importance of the documents

Bills: HB32, HB15, HB171, HB421, HB581, HB644, HB745, HB349, HB917, HB204, HB923, HB15, HB171, HB204

Keywords: eviction, landlord rights, tenant rights, justice court, property law, court procedures, chemical dependency, court-ordered treatment, mental health, health care, treatment facility, juvenile justice, criminal justice reform, deep fake, digital impersonation, age verification, private cause of action, explicit content, consumer protection, HB 581

Transcript Highlights:

• The first was that it's structured to regulate conduct, not content.
• It doesn't judge content at all. It is. ...It's judging the conduct, right?
• It puts the decision-making power for the content in the hands of parents. Yes.
• Constitutional, even if it is content-neutral.
• We do share your goal of protecting minors from harmful content online.

Bills: SB30, SB517, SB1313, SB1314, SB1316, SB1541, SB1698, SB1845, SB1860, SB2420, SB2429, SB 30

Keywords: gambling, criminal offenses, penalties, defense, electronic devices, tobacco advertising, youth protection, public health, criminal offense, retailer regulation, e-cigarettes, nicotine products, health, public safety, regulation, advertising restrictions, health and safety, elections, election audit, county elections

Bills: SB82, SB1807, SB2254, HB119, HB130, HB581, HJR98, SB1988

Keywords: business liability, concealed carry, handgun policy, premises liability, criminal acts, civil liability, business premises, concealed handgun, property liability, property rights, gun regulations, criminal liability, protective order, confidentiality, personal information, court records, victim protection, charitable raffle, nonprofit, wildlife conservation

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met to consider several pending measures and adopted committee substitutes on multiple bills before voting them out. Senate Bill 2403, Senate Bill 1888 (jury wheel procedures in certain counties), Senate Bill 2417 (Attorney General actions under the Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act), Senate Bill 2459 (personal identifying information for judiciary employees), and Senate Bill 2943 (discrimination involving occupational licenses) were each reported favorably to the full Senate, with most passing unanimously and SB 2943 passing on a 10-1 vote. The committee also certified SB 1888, SB 2417, and SB 2459 for the local and uncontested calendars, and later did the same for SB 2943. The committee then considered House Joint Resolution 98, the Convention of States resolution, which was reported favorably to the full Senate on an 8-3 vote. House Bill 1393, dealing with daylight saving time and keeping the state on daylight saving time year-round, was also reported favorably, with the committee noting it heard the House bill rather than a Senate companion. House Bill 2884, concerning financial relationship disclosures for defense contractors, was likewise reported favorably, with the final tally announced as 11 ayes and 1 nay. No testimony was taken in the excerpt, and no substantive debate was recorded beyond brief clarifications about the bills and their companions. After completing the votes and calendar motions, the committee recessed.

Bills: SB1521

Keywords: artificial intelligence, AI, generative AI, chatbot, conversational AI, companion AI, AI companion, virtual companion, chatbot regulation, minor safety, child online safety, parental controls, content moderation, self-harm, suicidal ideation, crisis intervention, mental health claims, romantic AI, emotional dependence, app store

Summary: The Government Modernization and Technology Committee met with quorum and heard Senate Bill 1521, presented by Representative Maynard. The bill is a child-protection measure aimed at conversational AI systems that simulate human companionship or emotional attachment. Maynard explained that, unlike a related House bill that bars minors from social AI companion systems entirely, SB 1521 would allow minors to use broader AI systems but require disclosures that they are interacting with an AI, not a human, and require safeguards against sexual conversations and encouragement of self-harm, including suicide prevention features. Representative Alonso Sandoval asked how the bill would interact with the earlier House-passed measure. Maynard clarified that the House bill applies narrowly to social AI companions, while SB 1521 applies more broadly to general-purpose systems such as ChatGPT or Gemini. He emphasized that the bill does not prohibit minors from using those systems, but requires reasonable protections and notice to minors. After the presentation and brief discussion, the committee moved to a due pass recommendation, with no further questions or debate. The vote was opened and closed, and the bill passed the committee 7-0. The meeting then adjourned with no other agenda items.