Video & Transcript Research : 'state refund'

Page 1 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/20/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • with um what the current law states with um what the current law states which<00:23:02.240> is
  • <00:37:00.920> which targeted uh property tax refund which targeted uh property tax refund
  • from the state of up to $11,000.
  • ><00:42:22.839> up<00:42:22.960> to refund from the state of up to refund from the state
  • <00:42:37.680> from refund from refund from $1,000<00:42:39.319> to $1,000 to $1,000 to
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/10/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, they're state of Minnesota.
  • , summary on um homestead credit refunds, summary on um homestead credit refunds, the<00:02:22.480
  • of the renter's credit across the state. of the renter's credit across the state.
  • every part of the state. every part of the state.
  • Refund.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Finance Committee 2/25/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:26:21.200> funding essentially it's not all state funding essentially it's not all state
  • State funds and then tying that into State funds and then tying that into those<00:52:36.920> in-person
  • <00:56:49.960> government um so I staff the state government um so I staff the state government
  • expert and they have 80% of our state expert and they have 80% of our state budget<00:59:15.520>
  • evidence-based operating in the state evidence-based operating in the state right<01:14:01.199><
Bills: HF1, HF779, HF1034
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Ways and Means Committee 3/10/25

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:01:18.000> spends women Bill currently the state spends women Bill currently the state
  • She noted that previous refunds, including the Jesse checks, were structured as a sales tax refund, and
  • represent and take care of the state represent and take care of the state budget<01:07:08.880>
  • Also, these pie charts don't factor in revenue from the state, state aids.
  • the AIDS that you provide us as a state the AIDS that you provide us as a state uh<01:36:14.360>
Bills: HF25, HF4
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 2/25/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • would be an account created to uh refund would be an account created to uh refund whether<00:02:
  • whether through property tax uh refunds whether through property tax uh refunds or<00:03:01.440>
  • and more a part of the way the state and more a part of the way the state moves<00:31:04.919>
  • get some good things um from the state get some good things um from the state level<00:32:12.320
  • makes it competitive with the states makes it competitive with the states around<00:47:17.480>
Bills: HF4, HF173
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Revenue and Taxation REVISED Feb 9th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • To jumpstart development and building across the state.
  • So I see properties like that all across the state.
  • So this credit is proven useful and closing the skills gap in the state by attracting out-of-state talent
  • After COVID, there are so many ways that you can live outside the state and work in the state effectively
  • We can't continue to lose companies to leave the state.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/12/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • gives you a refund.
  • . refund. refund.
  • staff, our state auditors.
  • Um means that there is an impact on, um, our state revenues and our state auditors.
  • state.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/13/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • and to be working in our state.
  • and to be working in our state.
  • and to be working in our state.
  • and to be working in our state.
  • Attracting people to come into our state and to be working in our state.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EEP Public Hearing - Tue Feb 3, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, at the same time, we of state law.
  • ,<00:09:01.279> resulting e-erts of the United States, resulting e-erts of the United States
  • Um and we do hard way in other states.
  • State your name. Okay. Mahalo.
  • governmental projects or >> like state governmental projects or state<00:37:43.599> supported
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to waste, recycling, and environmental review. On HB 1924, which would establish a mattress stewardship program, the Department of Health said it stood on written testimony and offered comments, while Hawaii Reef and Ocean Coalition and one individual supported the bill and the International Sleep Products Association opposed it. No questions were raised and the committee moved on. A large portion of the hearing focused on HB 2121, which would prohibit the sale of disposable vapes in Hawaii. The Department of Health supported the measure but suggested the bill may be better placed in a different part of state law because the cited waste-management section regulates products after consumption, while still praising the effort to remove disposable vapes from the market and environment. Testimony in strong support came from the Coalition for Tobacco Free Hawaii Youth Council, Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii COPD Coalition, Hawaii Health and Harm Reduction Center, the City and County of Honolulu, and many individuals; supporters emphasized youth vaping, toxic waste, lithium battery fire risks, and environmental harm. There was at least one opposing individual and the International Sleep Products Association was listed in opposition. The committee noted there were many written testimonies and no immediate vote was taken. The committee also heard HB 1928 on the deposit beverage container recycling program. The Department of Health stood on written testimony. The Solid Waste Task Force of Hawaii Environmental Change Agents and Upstream supported the bill but urged amendments to better integrate reuse and reusables, strengthen enforcement, clarify definitions, and protect existing redemption centers. The Hawaii Food Industry Association supported the concept of a backdrop program but preferred strengthening the existing program and raised concerns about undefined fees, existing infrastructure, and future audit costs. The Chamber of Commerce Hawaii supported the bill, and the chair said the measure needs work and that decision-making would occur in a few days. Finally, the committee took up HB 979 on environmental review and HB 1650 on environmental assessments. For HB 979, OPSD offered amendments, HCDA supported the bill but suggested clarifying the affordable-housing definition, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative supported it, and Earthjustice was asked about the court process for environmental challenges; the chair asked about shortening the challenge period and the relationship between environmental court, the intermediate court of appeals, and the Supreme Court. For HB 1650, OPSD and the State Historic Preservation Division stood on written testimony, OHA asked to retain historic sites, and several groups and individuals testified in support or opposition. Opponents argued that removing Wiki special district and historic sites from Chapter 343 trigger language would weaken environmental review and risk impacts to iwi kūpuna and historic resources.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 19th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am State Representative Ju, representing House District 6.
  • We require state, county, and municipal law enforcement agents to...
  • We’re asking for assistance and further assistance from the state.
  • Well, we don't... ...assistance from the state.
  • and... counties as well, um, across the state and...
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm unaware of the footprint in our state for battery versus Solar, which one benefits more from this
  • But as far as a dollar amount, as to where our state Tax dollars would go for that five-year period.
  • What we're doing is taking this away from both of them so that we're saving the taxpayer's refundable
  • We're the third lowest in the state, and so it's working, but we also need to acknowledge that these
  • And there's no impact to the state. It's all volunteer. Move for adoption.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It’s just the state of the industry across the state and across the country, so we’re not unique.” creates
  • > country across the state and across the country across the state and across the country so<00
  • <00:47:31.640> schools to grow more RNs with the state schools to grow more RNs with the state
  • then share it broadly across the state then share it broadly across the state about<00:51:51.480
  • <01:07:28.520> of important areas of the state of important areas of the state of Minnesota
Bills: HF110, HF111, HF263, HF105
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • As records, are they like on the state side?
  • Could you tell me what the state is going to do?
  • That doesn't go through the state department, or it gets to our state department of Education.
  • It comes to the state Department of Education.
  • United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the state's respectively
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • of Oklahoma. and Oklahoma State University.
  • our state faced in 2016 and 2017, the teacher walkout, ongoing construction of the state capitol building
  • Thank you for your service to our country and to our state.
  • It has been the honor of my life to serve the state of Oklahoma.
  • He is studying at Southeastern State.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/15/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Modifies Minnesota law to align with how the federal government and most states handle refund claims.
  • Most other states have refund provisions similar to those proposed in this bill.
  • Most other states have refund provisions similar to those proposed in this bill.
  • Most other states have refund provisions similar to those proposed in this bill.
  • > refund<00:16:15.760> provisions Most other states have refund provisions Most other states
Summary: The committee first adopted the April 14, 2026 minutes as amended, correcting a misspelling in the reference to Chair Davids. It then heard House File 4234, a tax-exempt bonding/affordable housing bill from Representative Rey Rower, and adopted a technical A1 amendment before laying the bill over for possible inclusion in the 2026 tax bill. The bill would conform Minnesota law to recent federal changes to low-income housing tax credit rules by lowering the amount of tax-exempt bonds needed for projects to qualify, with the stated goal of spreading bond allocations across more projects and increasing affordable housing production without additional state funds. Testimony in support came from the bill author, the Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, and Mary Tingerthal, who said the change would increase efficiency in the use of federal bond authority and could raise the number of funded housing projects from about 16 to 25 per year, bringing in roughly $120 million more annually for housing. Members discussed where the benefits would be felt statewide, including greater Minnesota and larger metro areas, and the author said the bill would help address shortages in affordable and senior housing. The committee took no final vote on the bill, instead laying it over. The committee next heard House File 3697 from Vice Chair Norris, which would change Minnesota’s tax refund claim timelines to better align with federal law and most other states. The author and a tax attorney testifier said the bill would reduce confusion and help taxpayers, especially vulnerable individuals who may overpay or be overassessed and then miss the current deadline to seek refunds. The Department of Revenue said it had no concerns with the language and did not oppose the bill, and the committee laid the bill over for possible inclusion in the 2026 tax bill. Finally, the committee began hearing House File 4738 from Representative Keeler, a Safe Harbor funding proposal for victims of sex trafficking and sexually exploited youth. The author described Safe Harbor as a statewide program serving youth across Minnesota and said the committee should consider creative funding options, but Chair Davids stated the proposed funding source would not work because it would take money from women’s sports scholarships. Testifiers from Lake House in Duluth and a former Safe Harbor youth described the program’s impact on homeless and trafficked youth, including shelter, mental health services, education, and transition to adulthood. The hearing continued with testimony, but no action was taken in the portion provided.