Video & Transcript Research : 'public regulation commission'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 16th, 2025 at 08:04 am

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee substitute adds that a public utility agency does not have the power of eminent domain
  • except as otherwise provided by Section 572.058.055, and establishes that public utility agencies are
  • TCEQ and the PUC are authorized to permit a public utility agency to serve as a temporary manager or
  • You know, we don't want to over-regulate groundwater since it is privately owned.
  • Utility Commission.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources met with a quorum present and first took up several pending bills for reconsideration and committee substitute adoption. House Bill 2692, relating to codification and clarification of local laws concerning the San Antonio River Authority, was reported favorably to the full House and sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars by an 11-0 vote. House Bills 1407, 1520, 1535, 2970, 4153, 291, 3663, and 3915 were also reconsidered or laid out as pending business, with committee substitutes adopted where needed and each bill reported favorably, generally by unanimous vote, to the full House and then to Calendars or Calendars/Calendars-related referral as applicable. The committee then heard House Bill 4530, which would expand the Texas Water Trust framework to include groundwater rights, require Texas Water Development Board review and approval of groundwater dedications, and notify local groundwater districts when groundwater rights are placed in the trust. The bill’s author and witnesses from the Environmental Defense Fund, The Nature Conservancy, and Chispa Texas supported the measure as a conservation tool and a way to create a clear process for voluntary donations; a Texas Water Development Board witness testified neutrally. The bill was left pending. House Bill 4931, relating to an aquifer storage and recovery project in Medina County, drew support from the author, the Medina County judge, and a regional water alliance witness, who described severe stress on the Edwards Aquifer, low levels at Medina Lake, and the need for a local water-supply tool. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5559, which would clarify enforcement of drought contingency plans for investor-owned water utilities and involve the PUC in model plan development, received support from groundwater district representatives but also concerns from water company and utility witnesses about enforcement authority, approval procedures, and potential conflicts with existing obligations to provide continuous service; the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5560, which would raise the maximum civil penalty for certain groundwater conservation district enforcement actions from $10,000 to $25,000 per violation, prompted debate over whether current law is already sufficient; supporters said the higher cap would better deter overpumping, while opponents argued existing penalties are already severe. That bill was also left pending, and the committee adjourned subject to call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 16th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee substitute adds that a public utility agency does not have the power of eminent domain
  • except as otherwise provided by section 572.058.0585 and establishes that public utility agencies are
  • The TCEQ and the PUC are authorized to permit a public utility agency to serve as a temporary manager
  • Additionally, they may request the Attorney General to appoint a public utility agency as a receiver
  • Utility Commission.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Transportation Feb 9th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Safety Commission, Brandon Popovac.
  • He would remove the Public Health Authority designation for the Traffic Safety Commission, as well as
  • It limits health care information collected by the Commission to Commission purposes only, including
  • Prohibits Commission reports from including information from which members of the public with some sources
  • And finally authorizes a private right of action. by the commission must only be used for commission
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development Committee Jan 14th, 2026

Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, currently we have two statutes that cover the State Ethics Commission.
  • </c><00:07:08.880><c> before</c> been executed by the commission before been executed by the commission
  • But since this is being rolled into public health, which is a good thing, because now it would really
  • allow them to expand their scope working on the public health departments, where they can also go to
  • </c> the public health through the public the public health through the public health<00:09:17.279><c
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Feb 10th, 2026

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Regulation Commission.
  • And they take that proposal to the Public Regulation Commission.
  • And it's the Public Regulation Commission's job to balance what is requested by these various power providers
  • The bill makes these large microgrids subject to Public Regulation Commission oversight and places firm
  • Because they are not utilities, they are unregulated by the Public Regulation Commission.
Bills: SB78, SB235, SB22, SB310
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 78, which would classify nuclear energy as renewable energy. Senator Thornton and supporters argued that New Mexico needs dispatchable, baseload power and that nuclear should be added to the state’s renewable portfolio standard because wind and solar are intermittent and require extensive land, mining, and battery storage. Supporters also emphasized nuclear’s zero-carbon profile, the safety record of U.S. Navy reactors, the possibility of small modular reactors, and the fact that New Mexico already uses nuclear-generated electricity from out of state. Opponents, including Senator O’Malley and Senator Charlie, argued nuclear is not renewable because it relies on finite uranium and creates long-lived radioactive waste, and they raised concerns about uranium mining impacts, waste storage, and the bill’s lack of a limiting principle. The committee voted 5-4 to do not pass the bill, with Senators Cervantes, Hamblen, O’Malley, Lopez, and Charlie voting yes on the do-not-pass motion and Senators Ezell, Scott, and Thornton voting no; the chair then explained that the vote reflected disagreement over whether nuclear should be labeled renewable, not opposition to nuclear power itself. The committee then heard Senate Bill 235, the Microgrid Oversight Act, with a committee substitute. Sponsor Senator Steinborn said the substitute would restore existing renewable benchmarks for microgrids, require large microgrids to meet zero-carbon targets by 2045, add reporting and PRC oversight, and close a loophole that could let utilities buy microgrid power and shift costs to ratepayers. Supporters, including environmental groups and community advocates, said the bill was needed to regulate large data-center microgrids such as Project Jupiter in Doña Ana County, which they said could drive major emissions, ozone, and nitrogen oxide pollution, strain water supplies, and undermine state climate goals. They also argued the bill would protect ratepayers and ensure transparency and community benefits. Opponents, including Americans for Prosperity, the Chamber of Commerce, oil and gas associations, Xcel Energy, PNM, Consumer Energy Alliance, and economic development groups, argued the bill would impose unnecessary regulation on private microgrids, slow investment, raise costs, and reduce flexibility for reliability projects and industrial development. They said microgrids are already regulated for safety and interconnection, and that the bill could discourage projects in New Mexico. In response, Steinborn said the bill was necessary because current law leaves a loophole for large polluting microgrids and because several major projects are already planned or underway. The committee heard extensive public testimony on both sides, but the transcript ends before a final vote on SB 235 is taken.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 16th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee substitute adds that a public utility agency does not have the power of eminent domain,
  • The TCEQ and the PUC are authorized to permit a public utility agency to serve as a temporary manager
  • Additionally, they may request the Attorney General to appoint a public utility agency as a receiver
  • Water and Sewer Utilities and the Public Utility Commission.
  • Quality (TCEQ) and the Public Utility Commission (PUC), requiring that Drought Contingency Plans (DCPs
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Feb 10th, 2026 at 09:05 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Regulation Commission.
  • And they take that proposal to the Public Regulation Commission.
  • And it's the Public Regulation Commission's job to balance what is requested by these various power providers
  • The bill makes these large microgrids subject to Public Regulation Commission oversight and places firm
  • Because they are not utilities, Because they are not utilities, they are unregulated by the Public Regulation
Bills: SB78, SB235, SB22, SB310
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Government, Elections And Indian Affairs Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:36 am

House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • First, it modernizes how the Public Regulation Commission is organized so it can better respond to today's
  • The public doesn't have that... Can you take a wage?
  • Okay, let's go ahead and provide one minute of public comment.
  • It would also open up transparency in the department because commissions make their decisions in public
  • They make decisions with the press and the public present.
Bills: HB70, HB93, HB95, HB139, HB140, HJR4
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, February 20, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • The county commission approves it.
  • </c> this is this is the gaming commission this is this is the gaming commission would<00:16:53.759><
  • </c> they have to put it on uh their public they have to put it on uh their public agenda.<00:30:04.240
  • </c> transparency and public input. Um, Mr. transparency and public input. Um, Mr.
  • Any others for public &gt;&gt; Any others? Any others for public testimony?
Bills: SF0045, SJ0001
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And as we know, the Public Utilities Commission, as the regulator, can have a voice here, and they are
  • And um as we public utility commission.
  • :02:34.319><c> commission</c><00:02:34.879><c> as</c> know the public utility commission as know the
  • public utility commission as the<00:02:35.360><c> regulator</c><00:02:36.000><c> can</c><00:02:36.640
  • utility commission that their public utility commission that also<00:08:23.280><c> reinforces</c><00
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation May 8th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • This does not specifically regulate nurdles, despite repeated spill events.
  • Implement similar regulations in four more states that are currently proposing PFAS regulations.
  • All of the regulations that are the basis for water quality are really based in public health. ...because
  • It's been regulated; land application of biosolids has been regulated, studied, and approved since the
  • Testimony mentioned other states that were regulating PFAS.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> public utilities commission as well. public utilities commission as well.
  • </c> other interveners with the Public other interveners with the Public Utilities<00:03:57.599><c> Commission
  • First up is Mike Bull with the Public Utilities Commission. Welcome back to committee, Mr. Bull.
  • I'm the deputy executive secretary for the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
  • public utility commission or PUC sorry public utility commission or PUC oversight<00:57:18.000><c> on
Bills: HF4236, HF4122, HF4377
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation May 1st, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a public health and public safety issue when you do not have a requirement for a permit because.
  • Speaking of design, I'm used to TCEQ regulating operations, but I'm not used to them regulating manufacturing
  • So, coming from the... ...who has to regulate and implement these rules and regulations, there is confusion
  • of environmental laws and regulations.
  • Otherwise, we find that needs are not being met by public services.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 4th, 2026 at 06:03 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Going back to you, any other brief comments before I go to the public? No, no, Madam. Chair.
  • can be made unless the majority of the full commission. agrees.
  • It protects due process and we hope. that it will increase the public confidence in the fairness and
  • credibility of those commission proceedings.
  • Is there So this is a continuation of our... or I don't think we need to go to public comment at this
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 4th, 2026

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • gun dealers for the benefit of public safety.
  • He's with the Department of Public Safety. He's with the Department of Public Safety.
  • So I... ...public safety in our streets.
  • It's hard to do statewide public policy on something that used to be a... ...to do statewide public policy
  • One, it regulates gun dealers more broadly, whereas last year's bill did not regulate gun dealers.
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 35, which would create one additional judgeship in the First Judicial District. Senator Trujillo and Chief Judge Bichai explained that the position had been approved through the judiciary’s unified budget process based on caseload and weighted-caseload needs. Members asked about how the new judge would be appointed, election timing, and courthouse space; the judge said the district would make room temporarily and that technology had helped with courtroom efficiency. One member of the public testified in opposition, alleging questionable case-assignment practices in the district court. The committee then voted do pass on SB 35 to the Finance Committee without objection. The committee then heard Senate Bill 17, the Stop Illegal Gun Trade Act, with extensive testimony on both sides. Supporters, including the sponsors, gun-violence survivors, prosecutors, law enforcement, city representatives, educators, and advocacy groups, argued that the bill would address a retail-to-criminal pipeline by requiring gun dealers to secure inventory, train employees, track sales, report suspicious activity, and restrict future sales of certain military-style firearms and large-capacity magazines. They cited gun violence statistics, local homicides, and the impact on children and schools. Opponents, including NRA and industry representatives, sheriffs, ranchers, dealers, and other citizens, argued the bill would violate the Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, create a de facto registry, impose costly burdens on lawful businesses, and fail to stop criminals. Several opponents also raised concerns about litigation costs and the effect on rural gun owners. Committee members then questioned the sponsors and debated the bill’s definitions, recordkeeping, confidentiality, and dealer requirements. Senator Duhigg offered and the committee adopted several amendments, including removing narrow loss-language tied to fire/theft/flood, changing backup timing language back to the federal standard, and revising the confidentiality/IPRA language to protect names and personal identifying information of transferees. The sponsors said the bill was intended to align with or build on federal standards in some areas while adding state-level dealer oversight. The chair allowed extended amendment discussion and indicated the committee would continue working through the substitute bill.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 4th, 2026

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Going back to you, any other brief comments before I go to the public? No, no, Madam Chair.
  • can be made unless the majority of the full Commission agrees.
  • We hope that it will increase the public confidence in the fairness and credibility of those commission
  • I don't think we now need to go to public comment at this point.
  • interest. ...appear before us and help build the record on behalf of the public interest, so that's
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 3, which revises definitions in the Mental Health Code and Assisted Outpatient Treatment Act related to “likelihood of serious harm” and decisional capacity. The sponsor said the goal was to make the standards more workable for courts and treatment providers in civil commitment and assisted outpatient treatment cases. Members adopted a friendly amendment that narrowed and clarified the language, including adding “intentionally,” tying decisional capacity language to a mental disorder, and specifying that a qualified mental health professional makes that determination. A second friendly amendment was then adopted to make the bill’s language consistent throughout the code by adding “serious” before references to harm to self or others in several places. Public testimony on SB 3 was mixed. Disability advocates, the ACLU, and Disability Rights New Mexico expressed continued concern about involuntary treatment, civil liberty implications, possible overuse of commitment as a shortcut around guardianship or capacity procedures, and the risk that some people could remain in the system for a long time. Supporters included the Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, police, and firefighters, who said the bill would provide clearer standards, better tools for crisis response, and alternatives to repeated arrest or emergency hospital transport. After debate, the committee voted 10-0 to give SB 3 a due pass as twice amended. The committee then took up House Bill 70, which was presented with a committee substitute intended to make the bill “sleeker” and address concerns raised by members. The substitute restored existing limits on commission decision-making, strengthened hearing examiner independence, reinstated current ex parte and Open Meetings Act guardrails, removed a proposed consumer advocate provision, and changed one provision from “may” back to “shall.” Members asked a few clarifying questions, including about advocacy staff and hearing examiners, and the sponsor said the changes improved the bill. The committee voted 9-0 to do not pass the original bill and due pass the committee substitute. The chair announced the committee had completed its two bills and adjourned after discussing upcoming meeting times.