Video & Transcript Research : 'non-exclusive easement'

Page 1 of 500
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • We have SB 2598 relating to non-general funds. Okay. Tom Yamashita with comments on Zoom.
  • And so we're just here to say, yeah, We ask for an exclusion.
  • So it's not as open ended questions or comments saying non Vice-Chair SB 2433 sd1 HD1 recommendation
  • This is relating to non-general funds. Questions or comments? Seeing none.
  • This is relating to non-general funds. Questions or comments? Seeing none.
Bills: HCR93, HCR14, HR85
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 19, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> easements for electricity delivery. easements for electricity delivery.
  • Subsection B says these easements are non-exclusive. That's good for the landowners.
  • We're talking about non-recorded easements and we're trying to create prescriptive easements, which are
  • We're talking about non-recorded<00:19:20.880><c> easements</c><00:19:21.919><c> and</c><00:19:22.160
  • ><c> we're</c><00:19:22.400><c> trying</c> non-recorded easements and we're trying non-recorded easements
Bills: SF0099, SF0116, SJ0006
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, February 27, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Subsection B says these easements are non-exclusive.
  • Exclusive would mean that only the utilities could utilize that easement.
  • So non-exclusive was important for our landowners who were involved in the stakeholder group, and I don
  • Uh, to follow up on that, um, I see a relationship with the fact this is a non-exclusive easement with
  • </c> the fact this is a non-exclusive the fact this is a non-exclusive easement<01:43:40.960><c> with
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/3/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The funds that are going to non-state entities, that money is considered a legislatively directed grant
  • That is the basic structure for non-state entity reimbursements.
  • That is the basic structure for non-state entity reimbursements. Uh uh represent Hansen.
  • </c> um the funds that are going to non-state um the funds that are going to non-state entities<00:20
  • As far as reimbursement goes, funds are expended by the non-state entities.
Bills: HF3426, HF3428
DE

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee Meeting Jun 24th, 2026

Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology

Bills: HB373
Summary: The Senate Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee met in hybrid format and heard testimony on several bills. HB 373, as amended, would regulate hemp-derived THC-infused beverages by defining the products, limiting them to 10 mg of Delta-9 THC per container, restricting sales to package stores and licensed marijuana retail stores, requiring testing and labeling, and imposing a 50-cent per container tax; the sponsor said the bill is intended to create guardrails and protect youth, and a wholesaler representative testified in support. HB 398 would allow racinos to serve alcohol until 2 a.m. and remove local authority to require earlier closing times; the sponsor and Bally’s representative said it would help Delaware remain competitive and increase revenue, and no opposition was heard. HB 433 would let municipalities and counties extend last call for bars, restaurants, and clubs from 1 a.m. to 2 a.m.; a witness from Connect Delaware supported it as a competitiveness and retention measure, emphasizing that it is permissive rather than mandatory. The committee also heard extensive testimony on HB 441, which would ban cryptocurrency kiosks/crypto ATMs in Delaware and require existing machines to be removed within 90 days. The sponsor and supporters, including AARP, the Delaware Department of Justice, and the League of Women Voters, argued the machines are heavily used in scams, especially against older adults, and that regulation has not been effective. CoinFlip opposed the bill, saying it is a regulated operator, that the fraud statistics are overstated or incomplete, and that Delaware should instead adopt a regulatory framework and amendment. HB 465 would update the criminal code to formally define virtual currency and incorporate it into theft, money laundering, racketeering, and search-and-seizure provisions; the sponsor said it would align Delaware law with modern crypto-related crimes, and no opposition was presented. The committee then heard HB 467, which would prevent landlords from requiring renters to buy insurance from a specific company while still allowing them to require coverage meeting lease terms; the sponsor described it as a consumer-choice bill and there was no public opposition. HB 435 would require payment parity for certified registered nurse anesthetists and physicians when the same services are provided; the sponsor, nurse anesthetists, the Delaware Health Care Association, the Department of Insurance, and ChristianaCare supported it as a workforce and access-to-care measure, with no opposition. Finally, HS 1 for HB 450, the Road DE Act, would overhaul permitting and traffic-impact review, emphasize peak-hour traffic, set density standards in growth areas, create a transportation impact fee, and direct some revenue to open space, farmland, and coastal restoration; realtors, builders, environmental groups, engineers, and GEAR supported it as a way to speed permitting, reduce sprawl, and improve infrastructure planning. The committee adjourned after public comment; no votes were recorded in the transcript.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • their manufacturer, their quote was the historical right of independent bottlers to territorial exclusivity
  • To territorial exclusivity is the foundation of the sovereign industry.
Bills: HB521
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> prohibited ownership and exclusive prohibited ownership and exclusive contracts.<00:02:57.360><c
  • Is curious about exclusive contracts.
  • Yes. exclusive contract would look like and exclusive contract would look like and whether<00:15:24.880
  • So, here and the issue of exclusivity.
  • </c> exclusivity because it goes both ways. exclusivity because it goes both ways.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, February 19, 2026

Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPN Public Hearing 01-29-2026

Commerce and Consumer Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are also technical, non-substantive amendments, and because it has a ways and means referral, we
  • <00:43:32.160><c> are</c><00:43:32.319><c> also</c><00:43:32.560><c> technical</c><00:43:33.599><c> non-substantive
  • </c> There are also technical non-substantive There are also technical non-substantive amendments<00:
  • There are also technical, non-substantive amendments. Members, any discussion?
Summary: The Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee opened its first hearing of the year with remarks from Chair Jared Kohole outlining hearing procedures, a two-minute testimony limit, rules for remote testimony and decorum, and a revised testimony-publication pilot that keeps 96-hour notice but returns to a standard 24-hour testimony deadline. He then moved through the agenda, beginning with SB 2004 on outdoor advertising, which would increase penalties for violations of billboard and outdoor advertising laws. Testimony on that measure was limited; Henry Curtis of Life of the Land was first up, and written support was noted from Hawaiian Electric and the Outdoor Circle. The committee then heard SB 2039 on election campaign finance, which would prohibit certain business entities from engaging in campaign finance activities. The Attorney General’s office offered comments and did not take a formal position at the hearing. Several proponents testified in support, including Josh Frost, Tom Moore of the Center for American Progress, Hapa/Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action, and Common Cause Hawaiʻi, all arguing the bill would curb corporate and dark-money influence and return elections to the people. Moore distinguished between regulating corporate “rights” and limiting corporate “powers,” and said the state can redefine the powers it grants corporations. In questions, Senator McKelvey asked whether the bill could be expanded to include unions; the Attorney General said he would need to get back with legal analysis, while Moore said his preferred approach would include all entities and that leaving out nonprofits or unions would create problems. Members also discussed whether the bill would affect PACs, and Moore explained that the proposal would prohibit corporate and dark-money flows into PACs while leaving individual political giving and existing political committees in place. The committee then moved on to the next measure. SB 2042, relating to insurance, was heard next. The bill would reduce the unimpaired minimum capital and surplus required of class 4 sponsored captive insurance companies under certain circumstances. The DCCA Insurance Division said it stood on its written testimony, and the Hawaii Captive Insurance Council testified in support, describing the change as a narrow, risk-based adjustment that would not affect the commissioner’s authority where actual risk resides and would help keep Hawaii competitive. The committee noted additional written support and proceeded without a vote or final action in the portion of the hearing provided.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Transportation May 28th, 2026

Joint Committee on Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • are a motorized scooter, a motorized bicycle, an electric personal assistive mobility device, and a non-motorized
  • We actually require motorized users to yield to any non-motorized user, and any wheeled user to yield
  • come up with some kind of registration and insurance thing, I would encourage you to make that open to non-residents
  • We do, however, ban all kinds of non-street-legal cars like race cars and tanks and I don't even know
  • A lot of people want to come here on non-cars. Thank you.” “Okay, well thank you, sir.
Bills: H5400, H5421, H5430, S3077, S3089
Summary: The Joint Committee on Transportation held a hearing on five bills, centered on the governor’s Ride Safe Act and related micromobility legislation. Administration officials from MassDOT and the MBTA described the bill as a first-in-the-nation, speed-based framework for e-bikes, scooters, mopeds, and similar devices, replacing outdated device categories with statewide rules on age, helmets, equipment, operating locations, registration/insurance for higher-speed devices, crash-data reporting, and battery safety standards. They said the goal was to improve safety and consistency without discouraging affordable, multimodal transportation or first-mile/last-mile transit connections. Committee members and several legislators asked about enforcement, data collection, battery fire risks, commuter rail accommodations, and how the bill would apply to shared-use paths. Some members supported the speed-based approach but raised concerns that the bill may need clearer path-speed limits, better education and enforcement tools, and more work on future regulations. Representatives and senators from affected districts testified in support, emphasizing rising complaints, youth injuries, and the need for uniform statewide rules. One senator urged quick action before summer, citing recent local incidents and the rapid growth of e-bike use. The micromobility commission panel, including bicycle, pedestrian, retail, and police representatives, largely supported the bill’s classification framework and crash-data provisions, but urged additional work on default path speed limits, automated enforcement, and funding for safer infrastructure. A police chief stressed the need for education, meaningful penalties, and training for officers. Two pediatric physicians strongly supported the bill but argued it should go further by adding a minimum age for faster devices and a universal helmet requirement, citing severe and increasing child injuries. UL Standards representatives endorsed the battery safety provisions and recommended tighter language requiring certification to recognized standards. Two members of the public who commute on vintage mopeds opposed the bill as written, arguing it unfairly excludes mopeds from micromobility protections and creates inconsistent treatment for similar low-speed vehicles. No votes were taken during the hearing.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy REVISED Apr 23rd, 2026

Energy

Summary: The committee first considered the nomination of Russell Isaacs to the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Isaacs described his farming background and experience with cotton, corn, sorghum, and wheat, and said he regularly tests conservation technologies on his farm. Senators discussed his water-conservation experience and the value he could bring to the board. The nomination received 10 ayes and 0 nays and was advanced to the full Senate floor. Members then took up House Bill 3183, dealing with smart transmission technology and electric grid efficiency. Senator Murdoch explained that the bill had been difficult to negotiate and that the enacting clause was stricken so work could continue on a committee substitute. He said the technology would allow existing transmission towers to carry lighter, more efficient lines, reduce wildfire risk, and potentially lower long-term rates by easing congestion. Senators asked about costs, who pays, and whether ratepayers or large load users would bear the burden; an amendment changed language from “customer funded” to “large load user funded.” The committee adopted the amendment and then passed the bill 7 ayes to 3 nays. The committee also advanced several nominations and bills related to environmental and energy policy. Steve Mason was confirmed to the Environmental Quality Board by an 8-0 vote. House Bill 4316, which removes an old deadline that prevented nonprofit corporations from converting into water districts and accessing grant funding, passed 8-0. House Bill 4484, allowing discretionary use of state-owned or state-leased vehicles between employees’ homes and workplaces to save mileage costs, passed 9-0. House Bill 3464 created a statewide framework for energy storage and solar facilities; a motion to table an amendment failed, and the bill passed 10-0 after debate over landowner protections, decommissioning, fire safety, and dual-use agricultural concerns. The committee then passed House Bill 3173, the Well-Repurposing Act, 10-0, to allow orphaned and abandoned wells to be repurposed for geothermal and energy storage uses, with discussion about surface-owner rights and possible tweaks to the geothermal temperature definition. House Bill 3469, a measure easing surety requirements for smaller producers by allowing a stair-stepped compliance schedule, passed 9-0. Finally, House Bill 3989 was amended for drafting corrections and then passed 9-0; it relates to the one-megawatt load standard and uses actual load over a two-year period rather than plate load. The chair ended the meeting by thanking members and staff and adjourning the committee.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government Apr 8th, 2026

Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Since a resident in one of our towns brought to our attention a non-level playing field in this voting
Summary: The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held a hybrid hearing on late-filed bills and formal petitions, with testimony taken on Senate Bill 3026 and House Bill 5294. For S.3026, speakers from the Six Town Regional Planning Board and local town boards supported the bill as a way to equalize voting access for residents in a proposed regional school district reorganization. They said the measure would give all six towns the same opportunity to vote throughout the day, rather than limiting some towns to a single voting window, and argued the decision is especially important given declining enrollment and financial pressures on the school districts and towns involved. The committee then heard testimony on H.5294, a Worthington home rule petition seeking a one-year moratorium on certain large-scale solar and battery storage projects. Worthington officials, residents, and public health and conservation advocates said the town needs time to develop zoning, safety, and emergency response rules before more projects move forward. They raised concerns about limited municipal staff, volunteer fire department capacity, water supply and watershed impacts, decommissioning responsibilities, and the cumulative effect of industrial-scale solar development on rural character and farmland. Several witnesses emphasized that their opposition was not to solar energy itself, but to the pace and siting of projects in small rural towns with limited resources. They argued that state siting and permitting processes do not adequately account for local conditions in western Massachusetts and that towns need time to evaluate legal, environmental, and public health issues. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the committee concluded testimony without further action announced.