Video & Transcript Research : 'local elections'

Page 1 of 500
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Local Legislation Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Local Legislation

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is the only county in the state of Alabama like this that is a local bill.
  • an amendment for local legislation.
  • There still is an extra layer for the citizens of that county to vote on the local legislation.
  • I think that's probably only the third local bill that has been passed in the last 10 years.
  • But there will be another local legislation committee meeting a week from today.
Bills: HB590
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee, February 27, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:
  • a special election.
  • . election. election.
  • And then the election part.
  • The year after that, we go into an election cycle. As we know, we’re nigh on elections.
  • ask for a hand recount on an election. ask for a hand recount on an election.
Bills: HB0022, HB0052, HB0076
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Constitution, Campaigns and Elections Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Constitution, Campaigns and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, and I know we've had some very close elections.
  • Um, now flipping a coin is still an alternative. election and one candidate received more election and
  • We had a Senate very close elections.
  • <00:11:39.680> one<00:11:39.920> vote election that ended up one vote election that ended
  • You know, I've been writing those papers since my first election in 1996, the special elections. >> Representative
Bills: SB42, SB166, SB42, SB166
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/18/26 - Afternoon Meeting

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • for election officials while maintaining election security.
  • for election officials while maintaining election security.
  • for election officials while maintaining election security. >> Finally, it updates pre- and post-election
  • for election officials while maintaining election security.
  • except for March Township elections except for March Township elections. elections. elections.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/2/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • driven by local government requirements. driven by local government requirements.
  • Um it's not the local language.
  • I mean, the way that this says election judges, not election judge, right?
  • I mean, the way that this says election judges, not election judge, right?
  • election judges as possible. election judges as possible.
Summary: The committee took up House File 2614, a bill aimed at preventing local governments from requiring or effectively mandating homeowners associations (HOAs) as a condition of residential development approval. The committee first approved the February 25 minutes, then adopted the DE1 amendment to HF 2614 before hearing the bill. The authors said the measure is a bipartisan piece of a larger HOA reform effort and that the language was negotiated with the League of Minnesota Cities and other stakeholders; they emphasized that developers could still choose to create HOAs, but cities and counties could not require them. Testimony in support came from Housing First Minnesota and the Minnesota Homeownership Center. Supporters argued that unnecessary HOAs raise housing costs, reduce affordability, and are often used to shift public infrastructure costs onto homeowners. They said HOAs remain appropriate for shared-wall housing, shared amenities, and other situations where common property is truly needed, but should not be imposed for single-family developments or minor features. Several members shared examples of HOA overreach and asked for clarification on how the bill would work, including whether developers could still request neighborhood signs or other features; staff and the authors said that would still be possible if the developer requested it rather than the local government requiring it. A significant portion of the discussion focused on stormwater ponds and other infrastructure. One member said the bill should not prevent cities from requiring stormwater facilities because maintenance costs and water-quality responsibilities can be substantial and should not be shifted to all taxpayers. The authors responded that the amendment language was intended to balance concerns about unnecessary HOA mandates with the need to address maintenance, noting that some maintenance responsibilities could remain with cities or be handled through developer agreements. A member requested a roll call on the bill, but the transcript does not include a final vote or disposition beyond the discussion and amendment adoption.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It simply helps cities align municipal elections with November elections by moving the date. of the election
  • each election precinct.
  • with local election officials to develop a plan to help remedy identified issues.
  • County election officials want to run elections that are fair, secure, and efficient.
  • It allows an unelected political appointee to seize control of local affairs from locally elected officials
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions, February 18, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:
  • as well as how the election code has historically treated those who will turn 18 prior to the election
  • general election.
  • not before the next upcoming election. not before the next upcoming election.
  • <00:03:06.400> uh voting in the upcoming election. uh voting in the upcoming election. uh
  • So, it election day registration.
Bills: SF0114, SF0102, SF0117
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 17th, 2025 at 10:04 am

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Committee members, I appreciate the opportunity to lay out House Bill 1968 as a former local elected
  • The intent of this bill is a simple principle: voters should only be voting in local elections where
  • They are not influencing school board, city council, bond elections, or other local races where they
  • This is a safeguard to ensure local elections reflect the voice of local residents—those who pay local
  • So again, this is just a safeguard to ensure that local elections reflect the voices of local residents
Summary: The committee first voted out two previously heard Senate bills without amendment: SB 688, relating to the date of the meeting of presidential electors, and SB 914, relating to authorizing certain cities to change the date of their general election for officers. Both motions passed on 8-0 votes with one member absent. The committee then heard HB 3909, which would change the current prohibition on wireless device use from a 100-foot boundary around a voting station to only inside the room where voting is taking place, with a committee substitute also adding state-prescribed signage. The author and supporters said the change would reduce confusion and make enforcement easier for election workers, while opponents argued the existing 100-foot rule helps prevent electioneering, recording, and possible technical interference with election equipment. The bill was left pending. Members also heard HB 1968, which would repeal a provision that requires counties to provide election services to certain political subdivisions in odd-numbered years but not even-numbered years, making county-provided election services consistent across years. Supporters said it would improve consistency for smaller cities and school districts, while opponents warned it could strain county equipment and staffing during heavy election cycles. The bill was left pending. HB 2279 would require voter registrars to remove a person from the rolls if the person swears under oath during jury service that they are not a U.S. citizen; supporters said this would streamline removal of ineligible voters, while opponents raised concerns about mistaken identity and loss of due process. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard HB 2803, which would require a presiding judge to give a poll watcher a signed statement explaining any removal from service. Supporters said this would improve documentation and accountability, and one witness asked for clarification that improper removal would remain a criminal offense; the author said he would consider a floor amendment and further discussion. The committee also heard HB 4253, which would create a more uniform voter-roll maintenance process based on inactivity, sending confirmation notices to voters who have not voted in the prior 25 months and eventually removing those who do not respond after multiple election cycles. Supporters said it would clean up outdated records and help keep voters registered where they actually live, while opponents argued it could wrongly remove eligible voters who simply do not vote regularly. HB 4253 was left pending as well.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 17th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • As a former... ...local elected official, and I see that we have at least one other former city council
  • . elections or any election between those elections.
  • election security.
  • in our election system.
  • A voter's ID and the VU ID, House Bill 2739 helps ensure voters are voting in the correct local elections