Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial district'

Page 1 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 16th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • court and the civil district court in Orleans.
  • But it’s in CDC, not criminal district court.
  • And why eliminate the criminal district clerk?
  • Duncan, who is the criminal district clerk.
  • Napoleon as the civil district clerk, Mr.
Bills: SB256
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Government, Elections And Indian Affairs Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:36 am

House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • He's a professor, and he's a district judge. That's a lot of jobs just in between me and him.
  • I am a judge at the Second Judicial District Court in the family division.
  • Madam Chair, House Bill 95 is to create a 31st district judge position in the Second Judicial District
  • District Court.
  • “And I think we should have the fifth judicial—excuse me, the fifth judge added for family court.
Bills: HB70, HB93, HB95, HB139, HB140, HJR4
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure Committee Feb 10th, 2026

Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:
  • form of government, and so as a republic, we are the representatives of the people that are our district
  • you and I get along very well and we're friends, and you, the commitment that you share for your district
  • ,<00:18:24.720> the<00:18:24.880> people<00:18:25.039> you for your district
  • , the people you for your district, the people you represent<00:18:25.520> is<00:18:25.760>
  • appointed we as the represent<00:20:21.200> of<00:20:21.360> our<00:20:21.679> district
Bills: HB403, HB399, HB392
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm a judge of the 138th Judicial District Court, which is a general jurisdiction court located in Brownsville
  • Increase judicial compensation.
  • You don't have the judicial? The judicial should be under 839.
  • that includes multi-county judicial districts.
  • district.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • To address judicial compensation as well as judicial transparency, accountability, and efficiency.
  • our judicial system...
  • judge of the 5th Judicial District in Bowie-Cass County, Texas, Northeast Texas.
  • district attorneys.
  • I'm a judge of the 41st Judicial District Court in El Paso. I'm one of 16 district courts.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial Conduct.
  • Now, they’re a district court judge.
  • live in my district.
  • On the state side for a starting district judge, if they don't have any previous judicial service, it's
  • And if we did not create a new district court, there would be no need for those new judicial positions
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial Conduct.
  • Now, they’re a district court judge.
  • live in my district.”
  • On the state side, for a starting district judge, if they don't have any previous judicial service, it's
  • And if we did not create a new district court, there would be no need for those new judicial positions
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It came out of, you know, Judicial Council and consultations with a number of these courts.
  • Currently, the Judge is serving the 51st, 119th, 306th, 440th, and 391st Judicial Districts, which cover
  • seven counties in my district.
  • This bill addresses the inefficiencies. ...by authorizing district judges in four judicial districts
  • This is allowed in county courts and district courts, but it's not been in Texas courts.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 7th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The district courts are really struggling with getting bailiffs and this increases their salary.
  • The program will provide loan repayment assistance to assistant district attorneys who commit to long-term
  • The program provides a financial incentive of up to $50,000 over five years to assistant district attorneys
  • Within the constitution, district and associate district judges are actually set forth, and they have
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, we want our judicial system to be fair and impartial.
  • Studies consistently demonstrate that implicit biases affect judicial decisions.
  • This bill adds five new chapters to the Special District Local Laws Code: one navigation district and
  • Authorities, one Water Control and Improvement District, and one Water Improvement District, with each
  • If it doesn't affect, it's district by district, so it doesn't affect most of the...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Furlow, here for yourself and the 106th Judicial District, and you are against the bill.
  • My name is Philip McPherlin, I'm the District Attorney for the 106th Judicial District, which... covers
  • I'm an Assistant District Attorney in Chambers County. on behalf of the Chambers County District Attorney's
  • attorney, judicial complaints, bar complaints.
  • It's going to change judicial rules or judicial financial interest or special interest in many . . .
TX
Bills: SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, SB1, HB4
Summary: The Senate briefly convened and received a message from the House stating that the House was taking a vote. No bills, motions, or substantive policy matters were discussed in the exchange. Pursuant to a previously adopted motion, the Senate then adjourned until 7 p.m. on Thursday, August 21.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Finance May 13th, 2026

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Bridget Hannah, Ascension Parish Clerk of Court, and I'm also representing all of the district clerks
  • I have Lauren Stelly with me from the 19th Judicial District Court to answer any questions that you may
  • Deputy Judicial Administrator at the 19JDC. Thank you all so much for having me here today.
  • because it sits at the seat of government, and so it does create a financial strain on the 19th Judicial
  • District Court.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • judges from eight years to six years, and prevent visiting judges from practicing in their assigned judicial
  • If it's contested, then it can go into the district court free, but if the state or members representing
  • Senate Bill 1734 creates a legal process allowing property owners to seek judicial determination that
  • conveyance incurs no cost for the citizens because there's no filing fee to have this petition heard by a district
  • we still had to record the document, albeit we do have the ability to consult with our county or district