Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial council'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Mar 31st, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is to create a carbon dioxide sequestration policy council under the Railroad Commission.
  • I understand that the bill seeks to engage the Bureau for participation in the Policy Council on the
  • Compliance would require the Council to access and review documents with the Railroad Commission.
  • The Council might spend a lot of time trying to deliberate on the wording of some of this.
  • Therefore, we're very supportive of the idea of a council.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • That will allow both MDJA and the judicial council to weigh compensation council recommendations before
  • <00:03:54.000> council allow both MDJa and the judicial council allow both MDJa and the judicial
  • council to<00:03:55.200> weigh<00:03:55.680> compensation<00:03:56.480> council
  • public testimony and engage council members formally and informally at council meetings.
  • <00:04:49.120> council formally and informally at council formally and informally at council
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, the Texas Judicial Commission on mental health, chaired by Justice Jane Bland, of which Speaker
  • Members, this SJR deals with the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which is created to protect. .
  • Thomas, I have you here on behalf of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, registered on the bill
  • I'm the General Counsel for the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • The Excellence Program is an initiative by the Texas Judicial Council to identify, support, and highlight
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Council for certain justices and judges.
  • Members, the Centers of Excellence program is an initiative by the Texas Judicial Council to identify
  • In 2019, the Texas Judicial Council recognized Webb County Court of Law II as a Judicial Center of Excellence
  • In this role, I also serve as the Executive Director of the Judicial Council, which is a policy-making
  • You know, I think the Judicial Council is constantly studying this and looking for ways and other things
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The judicial branch.
  • Um I'll just say too that the judicial Um I'll just say too that the judicial branch<00:15:44.720
  • increased staffing of the judicial increased staffing of the judicial security<00:38:36.320>
  • employees for the judicial security unit.
  • crucial protections to for our judicial crucial protections to for our judicial system.<00:43:14.079
Bills: HF3874, HF962
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • This places tremendous strain on the judicial system.
  • Our judicial system and our democracy is really too great.
  • The answer is not to transform the judicial system.
  • It's certainly not a few radical judicial activists either.
  • Only if they exercise their judicial power.
Summary: During this meeting, the committee focused on the implications of universal injunctions, which have become a significant concern in recent years. The discussion centered around various legislative proposals aimed at addressing the perceived overreach of district judges who issue nationwide injunctions that affect policies across the entire country. Several members expressed the belief that such injunctions undermine judicial authority and disrupt the balance of power between the judiciary and executive branches. Expert witnesses testified about the historical context of universal injunctions and the necessity for reforms that would limit the power of courts to grant remedies benefitting non-parties.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 16th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • But, you know, a lot of judicial opinions are just that. They're opinions.
  • So you have a mayor and then a few council members.
  • You have a police jury in a council? Yeah, because it’s a separate government.
  • But this is your city government as the mayor-council?
  • I think Jeremy just told me Livonia has a mayor-council, small city government.
Bills: SB256
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 14th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Since 1999, the total amounts deposited into the judicial fund by statutory probate courts and the total
  • If deposits exceed... ...the total amounts deposited into the judicial fund by statutory probate courts
  • Conduct, notice of certain reprimands, judicial compensation, and related retirement benefits, and the
  • reporting of certain judicial transparency information authorizing an administrative penalty.
  • Council for certain justices and judges.
Bills: SB1015, SB2933
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence heard testimony on Senate Bill 1015, which would clarify that the comptroller is responsible for distributing excess judicial fund payments back to statutory probate courts. Judge Guy Herman testified in support, saying the bill would help ensure probate courts receive funding they are entitled to, while Ed Heimlich testified against the bill with broad criticism of probate courts and judicial practices. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2933, which would add elder abuse training to required judicial education for several categories of judges and judicial officers; Dr. Bruce Hargrave supported the bill, citing the prevalence and underreporting of elder abuse and the need for judges to recognize warning signs. No votes were taken on either of those bills, and SB 2933 was left pending. The committee then reconsidered Senate Bill 38, an eviction-related bill, and Vice Chair Hayes described two agreed floor amendments: one limiting the summary disposition procedure to forcible entry and detainer cases involving squatters, and another requiring a notice to pay rent or vacate for tenants who had been timely payers but missed a payment. After discussion, the committee voted 6-4 to report SB 38 without amendments. The committee also adopted or advanced a series of other bills and resolutions, including SB 293, SB 1141, SB 1448, SB 1536, SB 1558, SB 1838, SB 1940, SB 2127, SB 53, SB 251, SB 311, SB 387, SB 441 (with a substitute), SB 1164, SB 1335, SB 1574 (with a substitute), SB 1719, SB 1760, SB 1839, SB 1923 (with a substitute), SB 2807, and SJR 27 (with a substitute). Most measures were reported favorably on largely party-line or near-unanimous votes, with a few close votes on SB 942, SB 311, SB 2807, and SJR 27. SB 942, relating to retroactive child support beginning at conception, initially failed 5-5 but was reconsidered and then passed 6-5. The committee adjourned after completing its agenda.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 14th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, since 1999, the total amounts deposited into the judicial fund by statutory probate courts and
  • Conduct, notice of certain reprimands, judicial compensation, and related retirement benefits, and the
  • reporting of certain judicial transparency information, authorizing an administrative penalty.
  • Council for certain justices and judges.
  • Council for certain justices and judges.
Bills: SB1015, SB2933
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/5/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • and our lease costs at the judicial and our lease costs at the judicial center<00:04:20.320>
  • safety and security for our judicial safety and security for our judicial officers<00:05:14.800>
  • There are five judicial officers.
  • In both cases, an expanded judicial In both cases, an expanded judicial security<00:19:45.280>
  • that we make in in the judicial branch. that we make in in the judicial branch.
Bills: HF3874, HF3875, HF3378
Summary: The committee approved the March 3 minutes and then heard a presentation from the Minnesota Judicial Branch on House File 3874, which was laid over for possible inclusion in a finance bill. State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba and Chief Judge Michael Fritz testified in support of a supplemental funding request focused on judicial branch safety and security, along with funding to cover the employer share of Minnesota Paid Leave costs. Shorba said the branch is seeking help because it did not receive funding for paid leave in the last session and is having to hold positions open to absorb the cost. The safety and security request included five parts: personal data protection for judges and court administrators, home security, two additional staff positions for threat assessment and coordination, security for the chief justice at public events, and a revived courthouse security grant program for counties. Testimony emphasized rising threats and incidents involving judges and court staff, including examples of doxing, home surveillance, and threats involving litigants, and cited increases in reported incidents, threats, and disturbances. Fritz said the branch’s current response system is stretched and that more law-enforcement-trained staff would improve coordination and response. Members questioned why the judicial branch should receive state funding for paid leave when private employers must absorb the cost, and Shorba responded that the branch was excluded from end-of-session funding decisions and that the mandate should be funded for all branches of government. Members also asked about the threat-response process and whether local law enforcement should be used more directly. Another concern raised was whether State Patrol troopers assigned to judicial security would have the training needed for criminal-code enforcement, and Shorba said the branch is discussing that issue with the State Patrol. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
VA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Two of those were recommendations from this council.
  • Chairman, members of the council.
  • I'm a new staff member with the council.
  • So it's up to the rest of the council.
  • And so because of that, the FOIA Council did issue this policy.
Summary: The Virginia Freedom of Information Advisory Council met in May 2026, welcomed new member Delegate Kimberly Pope Adams, and noted that Chair Marcus Simon could not succeed himself, so formal leadership elections would be deferred until a later meeting. Staff then gave a legislative update on 15 FOIA-related bills that had passed, including council-recommended measures on minors’ contact information in state programs and posting proposed agendas online, along with other changes involving lottery winners, utility account numbers, suicide fatality review teams, hospital workplace violence reporting, marijuana regulation, election records, law-enforcement oversight bodies, and a university name change. Members also discussed concerns about the new agenda-posting bill and the need to watch how it affects closed sessions and late-added agenda items. The council heard presentations on several bills referred to it. Delegate Wachsmann explained HB 313, which would expand FOIA access for nonresidents who own real property in Virginia; members raised concerns about drafting and scope, and the bill was referred to the records subcommittee. Delegate Cohen’s HB 463, which would redefine “meeting” and broaden remote participation rules, drew mixed reactions, with some members opposing it as too permissive and others suggesting narrower revisions; it was referred to the meetings subcommittee. The council also discussed HB 159 and HB 160, two bills aimed at speeding FOIA enforcement and clarifying remedies when public bodies fail to comply; after hearing from the Attorney General’s office and Boyd-Graves Conference representatives, members agreed these issues warranted a new remedies subcommittee. Under continued business, staff reported on a 50-state survey of the term “personal information,” and members asked for additional research on FOIA fees and alternative records-access models, including how other states and the federal government handle reading rooms and electronic access. The council also heard from Fairfax County about AI-generated FOIA requests, with concerns that AI can produce overly broad, adversarial, or legally confused requests that increase burdens and disputes; members suggested updating requester guidance and training materials. Finally, the council received a judicial update on four recent cases with limited FOIA implications, took public comment on out-of-state requesters and fee issues, and agreed to keep existing subcommittees, add a remedies subcommittee, and schedule subcommittee work before the next quarterly meeting.