Video & Transcript Research : 'ghost gun ban'

Page 1 of 263
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 2/24/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • uh magazine ban, which would ban uh magazine ban, which would ban uh capacities<00:08:30.160>
  • the guns, but it's the guns. the guns, but it's the guns.
  • “When you look at the 1994 assault weapons ban, gun homicide rates were already falling before the ban
  • of gun crime. of gun crime.
  • have upheld the ban or upheld the bans.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26 - Part 2

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We've banned flame retardants. We have banned PAS use and tried to limit that.
  • We've banned flame retardants. We have banned PAS use and tried to limit that.
  • We've banned flame retardants. We have banned PAS use and tried to limit that.
  • We've banned flame retardants. We have banned PAS use and tried to limit that.
  • We've banned flame retardants. We have banned PAS use and tried to limit that.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26 - Part 1

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • > has prohibit all ghost guns, this ruling has prohibit all ghost guns, this ruling has created<00
  • number on a ghost gun makes it far number on a ghost gun makes it far harder<00:06:29.840> to
  • with a gun get a ghost gun. with a gun get a ghost gun.
  • <00:09:53.680> guns referred to as ghost guns referred to as ghost guns are<00:09:55.120><
  • ghost guns. ghost guns.
DE

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee Meeting Jun 24th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • That is why last year we banned 287G agreements.
  • generally required to be directly supervised by an adult age 21 or older when possessing firearms, BB guns
Summary: The Senate Judiciary Committee met and heard presentations on several bills. House Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute 1 for House Bill 145 would restrict government use of reverse keyword searches, generally prohibiting reverse keyword court orders and voluntary requests, with a narrow exception for Class A violent felony investigations and rules on notice, deletion, and inadmissibility of unlawfully obtained evidence. House Substitute 1 for House Bill 368, with House Amendment 1, would limit Delaware law enforcement and the Department of Correction’s participation in federal civil immigration enforcement, especially regarding civil immigration warrants and detainers, while preserving exceptions for serious offenses and valid judicial processes; the Department of Correction said it had no operational or fiscal impact and supported the exclusions, and an ACLU-affiliated witness testified in support. House Substitute 1 for House Bill 427 would allow certain 16- and 17-year-olds to participate in hunting and target practice without direct adult supervision if they have parental permission, hunter education, and a valid Delaware hunting license. House Bill 355, the “Speak Your Truth Act,” would expand anti-SLAPP-style protections for survivors of sexual assault, discrimination, and harassment by raising the burden in defamation suits and allowing attorney’s fees and damages; advocates from the National Women’s Defense League and the Speak Your Truth movement supported it. House Bill 134 would increase penalties for repeat animal cruelty offenders and lengthen animal ownership bans. The committee also heard House Bill 133, as amended, which would create a hardship waiver process allowing courts to waive fines and fees for defendants who cannot afford them, while preserving restitution and exempting certain traffic-related penalties and victim compensation assessments. The administration said the bill is intended to address uncollectable debt and noted millions in outstanding fines and fees, while local government and police representatives raised concerns about lost revenue, administrative burden, and consistency; the Fines and Fees Justice Center supported the measure. Committee members asked about how the waiver funding would affect local governments, volunteer fire companies, and related fees, and the administration said the $5 million budgeted this year would cover the waiver costs and be treated as an annual expense going forward. No committee votes were taken during the excerpted discussion, but the chair indicated that bills ready for action would be circulated for signature or moved to the floor.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 2/25/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • ghost guns and requiring safe storage. ghost guns and requiring safe storage.
  • Paul cannot ban guns, but the local bookstore can, right?
  • Paul cannot ban guns, but city of St.
  • And ban guns on their premises, right?
  • nations that, uh, ban guns and, um, you nations that, uh, ban guns and, um, you know,<00:48:44.800
Bills: HF3351
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 11th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • They are strictly looking for guns and unfortunately with increasing frequency they're finding guns.
  • Once I break into the car, And I realized there's a gun there.
  • You're saying it bumps it up to a state jail felony if I take the gun and I keep the gun.
  • Right, since the focus is on the gun, there's got to be an intent.
  • The Constitution requires it to take a gun.
Bills: HB268, HB305, HB307
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I co-lead the Texas Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence alongside my friend and colleague from Texas Gun
  • are touched by gun violence, or the fear of gun violence in some way or another.
  • Instead, they're convinced that the answer to this crisis, which is caused by guns, is more guns.
  • More guns are not the solution. More gun safety laws are. That's why we're here today.
  • We know that domestic abuse and guns is a deadly combination.
Summary: The committee meeting was dominated by discussions surrounding gun violence legislation and the implications of proposed bills aimed at easing access to firearms. Numerous advocates and survivors of gun violence shared their emotional testimonies, expressing concerns about the safety of children and communities in the aftermath of tragic incidents. Notable speakers included representatives and community leaders who condemned the proposals that would allow younger individuals to obtain handguns and reduce restrictions on firearm carry in schools. The meeting concluded with a rallying call for lawmakers to prioritize public safety over the interests of gun lobbying groups.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • At many polling locations, however, this effectively bans people from using their phones while waiting
  • They said, fellow government, you can pass all the new gun laws you want, but we're not.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It's not about banning literature for children; it's about banning porn from our children's section.
  • So why ban? Why not ban everything, including religious books? Why the inconsistency, right?
  • Is anybody raising their hands for book bans? No? No?
  • The Nazis banned books.
  • Banning or restricting a book without these guardrails will inevitably result in the banning of books
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill is having a blanket ban for everyone under 18.
  • So we need to not—it's not about banning literature for children, it's about banning porn from our children's
  • It's about setting the stage for bans on LGBTQ+ content.
  • The Nazis banned books.
  • Banning or restricting a book without these guardrails will inevitably result in the banning of books
Summary: The committee took up House Bill 186, which would require social media platforms to verify users are 18 or older before allowing account creation. Invited witnesses in support, including Mary Elizabeth Castle and David Dunmoyer, argued the bill would protect children from harmful algorithms, addictive design, bullying, sexual exploitation, and mental health harms, and emphasized parental rights and the idea that minors should not enter binding contracts with platforms. Committee members questioned them about how algorithms work, whether parents could realistically monitor content, and whether the bill would still allow educational use; the witnesses said the bill was narrowly aimed at harmful social media use and not educational content. Public testimony on HB 186 was largely in opposition, though several student witnesses said they supported the bill’s goals but wanted the age lowered to 16 or the bill amended to allow parental consent or joint accounts. Opponents argued the bill would be ineffective because teens could bypass age checks, would cut off access to educational tools, school communications, recruiting and NIL opportunities, and would burden free speech and privacy. Some witnesses also said social media helps teens with mental health, community, and creative or professional opportunities, while others warned the bill could disproportionately harm disabled and marginalized users. After public testimony closed, HB 186 was left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 5138, which Chairman Hughes said would respond to a court ruling limiting the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute election crimes unless invited by local prosecutors by changing the statute to require AG prosecution. Public testimony on HB 5138 was brief and opposed by at least one witness who argued it would further erode local control and expand state preemption. The bill was left pending after testimony. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 3225, a library bill aimed at keeping sexually explicit books and materials out of children’s sections in municipal libraries and requiring age verification for checkout, including digital access, with parental consent and other revisions added in the House. Supporters said the bill would protect children from explicit material and keep such content in adult sections, while opponents argued it would amount to censorship, be costly and difficult to implement, and could be used to target LGBTQ+ or other marginalized content. Library workers, parents, students, and advocates testified that existing library sections already separate age-appropriate materials and that the bill could reduce access to books, burden libraries, and infringe on parental choice and free expression.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Border Security (Part II) Apr 3rd, 2025

Border Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • If a gun owner chooses to sell a firearm to an individual they know to be a member of a foreign terrorist
  • The bill does include an exemption for federally licensed gun dealers and manufacturers.
  • The committee substitute removes the exemption for federally licensed gun dealers.
  • Guns and money go south. Uh, just on the southbound operations.
  • Is, you know, stop buying the drugs and stop buying, stop selling guns, and, you know, from the citizens
Bills: SB36, SB2202
Summary: The Senate Committee on Border Security heard Senator Birdwell present SB 2202, which would create a state offense for knowingly transferring a firearm for profit or other remuneration to a member of a foreign terrorist organization. Birdwell argued the bill responds to cartel violence and southbound gun trafficking, and he explained a committee substitute that removed an exemption for federally licensed gun dealers and removed a requirement that DPS coordinate with Mexican law enforcement. He said the goal was to give Texas a state-level tool if federal enforcement is lacking. Invited testimony came from DPS Colonel Freeman Martin and border prosecution unit chair Tanya Ash. Both said the bill could be useful in some organized-crime and cartel cases, but they emphasized that proving a defendant knowingly transferred a gun to a foreign terrorist organization would be difficult and would usually require strong direct or circumstantial evidence, such as recorded statements, informants, or coordinated investigations. They said the measure would be more workable in complex cartel cases than in routine patrol stops, and they noted existing state and federal tools already address straw purchases, firearms trafficking, and related offenses. Members also discussed tracing seized firearms, cooperation with ATF, and the limits of state jurisdiction over international issues. No public testimony was offered, and SB 2202 was left pending. The committee then took up SB 36 as pending business. A committee substitute was adopted without objection, and the substitute bill was reported favorably to the full Senate by a 4-0 vote, with Senators Birdwell, Flores, Hinojosa of Hidalgo, Eckhardt, and Hinojosa of Nueces participating. The committee also accepted a motion in writing and ordered the bill recommended for local and uncontested calendar placement. The chair then announced the committee would recess subject to call.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill does include an exemption for federal agents, gun dealers, and manufacturers.
  • The committee substitute removes the following provisions... ...federally licensed gun dealers.
  • Let's go north; guns and money go south.
  • Some of the times when we take down drug loads, we also take down guns going south, and you get all that
  • They're really interested in every southbound arrest and seizure that we... have with multiple guns that
Bills: SB36, SB2202, SB 36
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 14th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm a gun lawyer.
  • This bill does not prohibit businesses from banning guns in their establishment in any way, correct?
  • If they still want to ban guns in their establishment, it's private property. They can do so.
  • You must ban guns. It is a felony offense to carry in that location.
  • I'm a gun owner. I have many guns.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 14th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The rules you want about no guns... in fact, almost every crime with a gun is committed in a no-gun zone
  • There is no compelling evidence to suggest that banning guns in polling places, as opposed to... to safety
  • As a gun owner and as a pastor, I do not want guns in polling places.
  • guns. If guns made us safer, we'd already be safer. But we're not.
  • No one's Second Amendment rights are being violated by banning guns at the polls.